原型批评的认知方式

On Cognitive Style of Archetypal Criticism

西方文化中包含着古希腊逻各斯中心主义和希伯来释经学两种认知传统,前者强调认知的唯一和终极意义,后者认可不同意义阐释的合理性和存在价值。维特根斯坦、罗素和萨义德等人分别在语言学、哲学和文学研究中表达了两种认知模式应辩证共存的立场。语言学领域的原型研究中突出了对"家族相似性"的阐释,人类学研究中提供了对颜色等认知范畴中"原型"和"模板"的发现。这些都表明,文学批评领域的原型批评也应是一种能够打破批评围栅,实现辩证认知的批评理念和批评手段。

There are two cognitive styles in western culture,namely ancient Greek and Hebrew logocentric hermeneutics.The former emphasizes the sole and ultimate meaning of cognition,the latter emphasizes reasonable values of different meanings and interpretations.Wittgenstein,Russell and Edward W.Said argued that these two cognitive styles should coexist whether in linguistics,philosophy or literature.Archetypal study in linguistics highlights on the interpretation of family resemblance,Anthropological study provides archetypes and templates of the category of color.All these show that the archetypal criticism in literary study should break the critical fence and be a dialectical idea and method.