期刊文献+

不同剂量舒芬太尼用于剖宫产术后硬膜外自控镇痛的效果比较 被引量:3

Effect of Postoperative Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia with Different Doses of Sufentanil after Cesarean Section
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察不同剂量的舒芬太尼用于剖宫产术后硬膜外自控镇痛的效果比较。方法将2009年4-11月60例硬膜外麻醉下行剖宫产手术术后的患者随机分为三组,术后镇痛液A组采用0.125%罗哌卡因复合0.3μg/mL舒芬太尼;B组为0.125%罗哌卡因复合0.4μg/mL舒芬太尼;C组0.125%罗哌卡因复合0.5μg/mL舒芬太尼,观察三组患者的术后镇痛效果(视觉模拟法评分,即VAS评分)及不良反应。结果 A组VAS评分高于B组和C组,B组VAS评分高于C组(P<0.05)。三组患者术后恶心呕吐、运动阻滞、嗜睡及肠蠕动抑制等并发症无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 0.125%罗哌卡因复合0.5μg/mL舒芬太尼以4mL/h持续输注用于剖宫产术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛术后疼痛VAS评分最小,患者镇痛满意度最高。 Objective To observe the effect of postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia ( PCEA) with three different doses of sufentanil combined with 0. 125% ropivacaine after cesarean section. Methods Data was collected from April 2009 to November 2009. Sixty patients after cesarean section under continuous epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into three different groups. Group A was given sufentanil 0. 3 μg/mL and 0. 125% ropivacaine for PCEA,group B was given sufentanil 0. 4 μg/mL and 0. 125% ropivacaine,group C was given sufentanil 0. 5 μg/mL and 0. 125% ropivacaine. The analgesia effects were evaluated by the visual analogue scales ( VAS). Side effects were also recorded. Results The VAS scores were significantly the highest in group A than that in group B and group C,the VAS scores in group B were higher than that in group C ( P 〈0. 05). The incidence of side effects,such as postoperative nausea and vomiting,lethargy,and pruritus,was not significant among the three groups ( P 〉0. 05). Conclusion 0. 5 μg/ mL sufentanil and 0. 125% ropivacaine recommended for PCEA with background 4 mL/h is safe and effective for patients after cesarean section.
作者 杨昶
出处 《华西医学》 CAS 2010年第8期1530-1532,共3页 West China Medical Journal
关键词 舒芬太尼 自控硬膜外镇痛 剖宫产 罗哌卡因 Sufentanil Patient-controlled epidural analgesia Cesarean section Ropivacaine
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献10

  • 1Kampe S, Kiencke P, Krombach J, et al. Current practice in postoperative epidural analgesia: a german survey. Anesth Analg, 2002, 95:1767-1769.
  • 2Macias A, Monedero P, Adame M, et al. A randomized, double-blinded comparison of thoracic epidural ropivacaine, ropivacaine/fentanyl, or bupivacaine/fentanyl for postthoracotomy analgesia. Anesth Analg, 2002,95:1344-1350.
  • 3Hubler M, Litz RJ, Sengebusch KH, et al. A comparison of five solutions of local anaesthetics and/or sufentanil for continuous, postoperative epidural analgesia after major urological surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2001,18:450-457.
  • 4Kampe S, Randebrock G, Kiencke P, et al. Comparison of continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine and sufentanil with intravenous patientcontrolled analgesia after total hip replacement. Anaesthesia, 2001, 56:1189-1193.
  • 5Pouzeratte Y, Delay JM, Brunat G, et al. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after abdominal surgery: ropivacaine versus bupivacaine.Anesth Analg, 2001, 93:1587-1592.
  • 6Whiteside R, Jones D, Bignell S, et al. Epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl following major gynaecological surgery: the effect of volume and concentration on pain relief and motor impairment. Br J Anaesth, 2000,84: 720-724.
  • 7Senard M, Joris JL, Ledoux D, etal. Acomparison of 0.1% and 0.2% ropivacaine and bupivacaine combined with morphine for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery.Anesth Analg, 2002, 95:444-449.
  • 8Liu SS, Moore JM, Luo AM, et al. Comparison of three solutions of ropivacaine/fentanyl for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Anesthesiology, 1999, 90:727-733.
  • 9金昔陆,池志强.μ阿片受体激动剂舒芬太尼的药理作用和应用[J].中国现代应用药学,1999,16(1):1-5. 被引量:244
  • 10许立新,佘守章,许学兵,闫焱,谢晓青.等效剂量舒芬太尼或芬太尼复合罗比卡因术后硬膜外病人自控镇痛效应的观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2004,20(5):280-282. 被引量:86

共引文献43

同被引文献18

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部