权变视角下的质量管理研究前沿探析被引量：1

导出

摘要在权变理论框架下,企业所采取的质量管理实践可能是有效的,也可能是无效的,这取决于企业所处的环境。本文首先对质量管理权变研究的定义及研究内容进行了回顾,在此基础上总结了质量管理权变研究中的变量及其测量方法,并对这些变量进行了分类;随后把当前的质量管理权变研究按研究内容分为三类,分别对这三类研究进行了述评,并明确了当前质量管理权变研究中存在的问题;最后提出了质量管理权变研究的未来发展方向。

作者宋永涛苏秦程子潇

机构地区西安交通大学管理学院机械制造系统工程国家重点实验室教育部过程控制与效率工程重点实验室中国中铁一局集团有限公司

出处《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第9期59-64,F0003,共7页 Foreign Economics & Management

基金国家自然科学基金项目<研发过程质量管理方法与控制技术研究>(编号:70872091) 国家自然科学基金项目<质量管理实践对企业绩效的影响机理及其动态评估研究>(编号:70672056) 西安交通大学校内基金项目<研发过程质量管理实践对研发绩效影响的贝叶斯动态评价研究>(编号:08140010)

关键词质量管理权变理论情境变量绩效

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Powell, T C. Total quality management as competitive advantage:A review and empirical study[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16(1):15-37.
2Curkovic, S, Vickery, S, and Droge, C. Quality-related action programs: Their impact on quality performance and firm performance[J]. Decision Science, 2000, 31(4):885-905.
3Kaynak, H. The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performanee[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2003, 21(2):405-435.
4李钊,苏秦,宋永涛.质量管理实践对企业绩效影响机制的实证研究[J].科研管理,2008,29(1):41-47. 被引量：29
5Smith, P B, Misumi, J, Tayeb, M, Peterson, M,and Bond, M. On the generality of leadership style measures across cultures [J]. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1989, 62(2) :97-109.
6Sitkin, S B, Sutcliffe, K M, and Schroeder, R G. Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: A contingency perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19(3):537-566.
7Das, A, Handfield, R B, Calantone, R J, and Ghosh, S. A contingent view of quality management:The impact of international competition on quality[J]. Decision Science, 2000, 31(3):649-690.
8Sousa, R, and Voss, C A. Quality management practice:Universal or context dependent? [J]. Production and Operations Management, 2001, 10(4):383-404.
9Sila, I. Examining the effects of contextual factors on TQM and performance through the lens of organizational theories:An empirical study[J]. journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25( 1):83-109.
10Madu, C H, Kuei, C H, and Lin, C. A comparative analysis of quality practice in manufacturing firms in the US and Taiwan [J]. Decision Sciences, 1995, 26(5):621-635.

二级参考文献15

1Sime Curkovic, Shawnee Vickery, Cornelia Droge. Quality- related action programs: Their impact on quality performance and firm performance [ J ]. Decision Science, 2000,31 ( 4 ) : 885 - 905.
2Ismail Sila, Mailing Ebrahimpour. An investigation of the total quality management survey based research published between 1989 and 2000 [ J]. The International Journal of quality of Quality & Reliability Management, 2002, 19(7) :902 -970.
3Dow, D. , Samson, D. , Ford, S.. Exploding the myth: Do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance? [J]. Production and Operations Management, 1999,8(1) :1 -27.
4Crosby, P.B.. Quality is free[ M]. New York: McGraw - Hill, 1979:97-98.
5Juran,J. M. , Gryna, F.M.. Quality planning and analysis [ M ]. New York : McGraw - Hill, 1980 : 104 - 105.
6Deming, W.W.. Out of the crisis[ M]. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1982:66 - 68.
7Garvin, D. A.. Competing on the eight dimensions of quality[ J]. Harvard Business Review, 1987,61(5) : 101 - 109.
8Zhihai Zhang. Developing a model of quality management methods and evaluating their effects on business performance [J]. Total Quality Management, 2000,11(1) :129- 137
9Arawati Agus. The Structural Linkages between TQM, Product Quality Performance, and Business Performance: Preliminary Empirical Study in Electronics Companies[ J]. Singapore Management Review, 2005,27( 1 ) :87 - 105.
10Powell, T.C.. Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995,16 ( 1 ) : 15 - 27.