期刊文献+

如何实践“中体西用”:张之洞与清末新刑律的修订 被引量:8

Mr. Zhang Zhidong's Practice of ‘Taking Chinese System as a Body and the Western One as Its Utility’ in Revising a New Criminal Law in the Late Qing Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 张之洞以维持礼教为由反对日本法学家起草的新刑律草案,论者以之为囿于"中体西用"说的表现,往往有顽固保守之评。不过若仔细检视其事及其主张,不难发现张氏反对的内容其实相当有限,其主旨显然不是要全盘推翻草案,而是在效仿西法、收回法权的同时亦可维持守约式的礼教。然而庚子以后尊西趋新之风极盛,加上商约条文放大了收回法权的愿景,不但传媒舆论几乎一面倒地支持新刑律,就连朝廷对张氏的诉求也阳奉阴违,核订新刑律实际秉持"完全以世界为主"的宗旨。可见张说在清季最后几年逐渐丧失了实践的可能性,"中学不能为体"的时代已经来临。 Based on the ground for preserving Chinese traditional ethical norms (Lijiao), Mr. Zhang Zhidong opposed the draft of the New Criminal Law prepared by Japanese jurists. Considering it as an idea constrained by his thought of taking the Chinese system as a body and the western one as its utility (Zhongti Xiyong), critics usually dismissed him as being stubborn and conservative. A close examination of the whole case and his view is done in the paper to reveal that the extent of Mr. Zhang’s opposition was fairly limited. He did not intend to overturn the whole draft but to maintain the Chinese traditional ethical norms as a western contractual behavior while adopting the western law and recovering China’s consular jurisdiction at the same time. But the new trend of respecting western things had become exceedingly popular after 1900. In addition, relevant clauses of a series of commercial treaties around that time were signed with foreign countries in order to obtain a prospect of recovering consular jurisdiction. Not only did journalists overwhelmingly support the New Criminal Law, but even the Court of the Qing dynasty overtly agreed to it and covertly opposed Mr. Zhang’s proposal, and asserted that the New Criminal Law must uphold the principle that ‘entirely lays emphasis on the world’ instead of the tra- dition. It is evident that the possibility of putting Zhang’s idea (Zhongti Xiyong) into practice had steadily come to an end in the last years of the Qing dynasty. By then, a time arrived when Chinese learning could not be its principle any more.
作者 李欣荣
机构地区 中山大学历史系
出处 《学术研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第9期108-116,共9页 Academic Research
基金 中山大学青年教师起步资助计划(11200-3126170)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献68

  • 1罗志田.再造文明之梦:胡适传(1891-1929)[M].北京:中华书局,2006.
  • 2驻清公使致林董外务大臣电[A].外国官厅二於于本邦人雇入关系杂件(清国/部)[z].日本外交史料馆藏档案,档号:3-8-4/16-2.
  • 3冈田朝太郎.清国/刑法草案二付テ.日本法学志林,(1910).
  • 4修律大臣沈家本奏刑律草案告成分期缮单呈览并陈修订大旨折[A].故宫博物院明清档案部编.清末筹备立宪档案史料(下)[Z].北京:中华书局,1979.
  • 5修订法律大臣法部右侍郎沈家本奏刑律分则草案告成折[N].政治官报,第69号,光绪三十三年十一月二十九日.
  • 6章宗祥.新刑律颁布之经过[A].全国政协文史委员会编.文史资料存稿选编(晚清·北洋上)[Z].北京:中国文史出版社.2002.
  • 7法律学堂总教习待聘[N].华宇汇报.,丙午(1906年)五月初九日.
  • 8黄源盛.民初法律变迁与裁判[M].台北:台湾政治大学,2000.
  • 9李良 彭时合编.《刑事学派与暂行新刑律》[J].法律评论,1927,(193).
  • 10农工商部前送刑律草案总分则均属平允妥协本部无庸另加签注由[z].一档馆宪政编查馆全宗,第52号卷宗.

二级参考文献78

  • 1徐晓光,石泉长.清宋的法制改革及其历史意义[J].社会科学辑刊,1992(6):98-102. 被引量:2
  • 2任放.近百年张之洞研究述评[J].近代史研究,2003(2):236-275. 被引量:11
  • 3李启成.领事裁判权制度与晚清司法改革之肇端[J].比较法研究,2003,17(4):16-28. 被引量:18
  • 4闫晓君.走近“陕派律学”[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2005,23(2):122-128. 被引量:22
  • 5《补录宁绍商轮公司呈请立案文》《申报》1909年5月3日
  • 6吉同钧.《乐素堂主人白叙赋》,载《乐索堂文集》卷3,北京:中华印书局,1932年,第16页.
  • 7《我国法律教育之历史谭》,载何勤华、魏琼编《董康法学文集》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005年,第737页.
  • 8沈家本.《大清律例讲义·序》,载《历代刑法考(四)·寄衫文存》,北京:中华书局,1985年,第2232页.
  • 9《吉同钧东行H记》,载《近代史资料》总87号,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1996年,第79页.
  • 10吉同钧.《上修律大臣酌除重法说帖》,载《审判要略》,宣统二年法部律学馆石印本,第1-8页.

共引文献89

同被引文献311

引证文献8

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部