期刊文献+

化妆品安全性风险评估的方法

The Method of Cosmetic Risk Assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 化妆品安全性风险评估是化妆品安全体系的核心与基础,可分为危害识别、危害特征描述、暴露评估以及风险特征描述四个步骤。化妆品安全性风险评估主要依赖于毒理学手段,同时还需要利用化学、物理学、计算和统计科学等多学科交叉的方法才可实现。随着动物保护意识的增强,毒理学替代法的应用研究已成为重要的发展方向之一。 Cosmetic risk assessment is the basic and core of the cosmetic safety system. It contains four parts, including hazard identification, dose-response assessment, exposure assessment and risk characterization. Most methods of the cosmetic risk assessment are come from toxicology. However, cosmetic risk assessment still requires a multi-disciplinary approach covering detailed knowledge of chemistry, physics and statistics, etc. As awareness of animal protection enhances, toxicology substitution methods are one of the important of development.
作者 高晓譞 赵华
机构地区 北京工商大学
出处 《北京日化》 2010年第3期2-8,共7页 Beijing Daily Chemical
关键词 化妆品安全性风险评估 危害鉴别 作用评估 暴露量评估 风险特征描述 Cosmetic Risk Assessment Hazard identification Dose-response assessment Exposure assessment Risk characterization
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Scientific Committee on Consumer Products. The SCCP'S Notes of Guidance for the Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients And Their Safety Evaluation 6th Revision[Z], 2006.
  • 2刘学军.化妆品及洗涤产品等的人体安全性风险评估(P&G)[J].毒理学杂志,2005,19(A03):331-331. 被引量:5
  • 3Bhogal N, Grindon C, Combes R. Toxicity Testing: Creating A Revolution Based On New Technologies[J] TRENDS in Biotechnology, 2005, 23(6): 299-307.
  • 4Buche P, Violin L, Girard E Evaluation of the Effects of Cosmetic Or Dermo-pharmaceutical Products on Cutaneous Energy Metabolism Using the Episkin Model of Reconstructed Epidermis[J]. Cell Biology and Toxicology, 1994, 10(5-6): 381-385.
  • 5Lelievrea D, Justinea P, Christiaens F, et al. The Episkin Phototoxicity Assay (EPA): Development of An in Vitro Tiered Strategy Using 17 Reference Chemicals to Predict Phototoxic Potency[J]. Toxicology in Vitro, 2007, (21)6: 977-995.
  • 6Wilson P, Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Induction of Epidermis And Inhibition of Neural Fate by Bmp-4[J]. Nature, 1995, 376: 331-333.
  • 7Spielmann H, Hoffmann S, Liebsch M, et al. The ECVAM International Validation Study on In vitro Tests for Acute Skin Irritation: Report on the Validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm Assays And on the Skin Integrity Function Test[J]. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 2007, (35)6:559-601.
  • 8Mallampatia R, Patlollaa R, Agarwala S, et al. Evaluation of EpiDerm Full Thickness-300 (EFT-300) As an in Htro Model for Skin Irritation: Studies on Aliphatic Hydrocarbons[J]. Toxicology in Vitro, 2010, 24(2): 669-676.
  • 9Gordon V, Mirhashemi S, Harutunian V, et al. Evaluation of the in Vitro CORROSITEX System to Predict Corrosivity in Studies of Over 900 Chemicals, Mixtures, Formulations, and Waste[J]. Toxicology Letters, 1994, 74(1): 31.
  • 10Schultz T, Cronin M, Netzeva T. The Present Status of QSAR in Toxicology[J]. Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM, 2003, 622(1-2): 23-38.

二级参考文献55

  • 1[1]Hopfinger AJ.A QSAR investigation of dihydrofolate reductase inhibition by baker trizaines based upon molecular shape analysis[J],J Am Chem Soc,1980,102(24):7196-7206.
  • 2[2]Contreras ML,Gonzalez FD,Munoz VC,et al. Computer assisted molecular design and biophore determination. Application to AIDS drugs[J]. Bol Soc Chil Quim,1995, 40(3):279-291.
  • 3[3]Crippen GM.Quantitative structure-activity relationships by distance geometry: systematic analysis of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors[J]. J Med Chem,1980,23(6):599-606.
  • 4[4]Cramer III RD, Patterson DE, Bunce JD. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins[J].J Am Chem Soc,1988,110(18): 5959- 5967.
  • 5[5]Silverman BD. Three-dimensional moments of molecular property fields[J].J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 2000,40(6):1470-1476.
  • 6[6]Ferguson AM, Heritage T, Jonathon P, et al.EVA: a new theoretically based molecular descriptor for use in QSAR/QSPR analysis[J].J Comput Aided Mol Des, 1997,11(2):143-152.
  • 7[7]Gancia E, Bravi G, Mascagni P, et al. Global 3D-QSAR methods: MS-WHIM and autocorrelation[J],J Comput Aided Mol Des, 2000,14(3):293-306.
  • 8[8]Klebe G, Abraham U, Mietzner T.Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity[J]. J Med Chem, 1994,37(24):4130-4146.
  • 9[9]Pastor M, Cruciani G, McLay I, et al.GRid-INdependent descriptors (GRIND): a novel class of alignment-independent three-dimensional molecular descriptors[J].J Med Chem, 2000,43(17):3233-3243.
  • 10[10]Verli H, Albuquerque MG, de Alencastro RB,et al.Local intersection volume: a new 3D descriptor applied to develop a 3D-QSAR pharmacophore model for benzodiazepine receptor ligands[J].Eur J Med Chem, 2002,37(3):219-229.

共引文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部