摘要
在碰触到不符合正义本质的国家法律时,苏格拉底与安提戈涅做出了不同选择,前者服从,后者以死抗拒,显现出公民对国家法律所持的截然不同的态度。在建设法治国家的过程中,遵守法律、维护法的安定性是现代社会公民对国家的第一要务,但正当性接受亦是确立法治本质中的核心要素,二者不可偏废。
Facing national laws that were against the nature of justice,Socrates and Antigone made different choices：the former chose to obey those laws;the latter to prefer to die rather than obey those laws,which demonstrated citizens＇ completely different attitudes toward national laws.In the process of building a country under the rule of law,while obeying laws and maintaining law＇s stability are the most important obligations of citizens in modern society;the legitimacy is a core factor of the rule of law.Therefore,neither of the two can be neglected.
出处
《北京行政学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期84-89,共6页
Journal of Beijing administration institute
基金
江苏省人事厅2009年度"江苏省博士后科研资助计划"资助项目(0901098C)
关键词
法律的接受
法安定性
正当性
法治
adopting law
law＇s stability
legitimacy
the rule of law
