对近20年来美国中国“民族主义”研究中“冷战”思维范式的反思被引量：2

Reflections over the"Cold War"Paradigm of Thinking in American Studies on Chinese"Nationalism"over the Past 20 Years

导出

摘要在美国学界关于当代中国"民族主义"研究中,部分学者依然延续着"冷战"思维范武。这种范式的主要特征是:思维预设上表现为强调东西方意识形态的对立;思维理路体现为从共产主义意识形态的角度考量中国"民族主义";在分析中国"民族主义"方法上采取单方面展示的策略。从本质上讲,"冷战"思维范式是西方中心思维范式的极端化,其思维根源是二元对立的思维方式。以"冷战"思维范式考量当代中国"民族主义"问题给中美公众带来了相互敌视的恶性循环,而"冷战"思维范式中也凸显了美国部分学者双重标准的悖论。 In American Academic studies on'nationalism'in contemporary China some scholars still adhere to the'Cold War'paradigm of thinking which is characterized by the following:First,the presupposition of their thinking is the stress on the East-West ideological confrontation;Second,following their line of reasoning,they observe Chinese'nationalism'from the perspective of communist ideology;Third,in their analysis of Chinese'nationalism'they adopt the approach of unilateral display. In essence,the'Cold War'paradigm of thinking is an extreme expression of the paradigm of thinking with the West as the center,rooted in binary opposition in the mode of thinking.Considering'nationalism'in contemporary China with the'Cold War'paradigm of thinking has brought about a vicious cycle of mutual hostility between the Chinese and the American public and the'Cold War'paradigm of thinking has also highlighted some American scholars' paradox of a double standard.

作者韦磊

机构地区中国地质大学人文学院

出处《当代中国史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期109-116,共8页 Contemporary China History Studies

关键词美国当代中国“民族主义”研究 “冷战”思维范式 the United States contemporary China 'nationalism'studies the'Cold War'paradigm of thinking

分类号 D871.2 [政治法律—外交学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献27

1Yongnian Zheng, Discovering Chinese Nationalism in China, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 7.
2Thomas A. Metzger and Ramon H. Myers, Chinese nationalism and American policy, Orbis, Vol. 42, (Winter, 1995. ) pp. 21-36.
3Aaron L. Friedberg, Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia, International Security, No. 3 (Winter, 1993) .
4Charles. Krauthamme, Why We Must Contain China? Time, New York: Jul. 31, 1995. p. 72.
5Cheng Chen, Illiberal Nationalism in Post -Leninist States, University of Pennsylvania, Ph.D. , 2003. p. 1.
6陶文钊编选.《费正清集》，天津人民出版社，1992年版，第253页.
7Fareed Zakaria, Oon't Feed China's Nationalism, http : //www. newsweek, com/id/131751.
8David Shambaugh, China's Competing Nationalisms, http: //www. brookings, edufopinionsf2OOSf0505 china_ shambaugh, aspx.
9Perry Link, A Short Anatomy of Chinese Nationalism Today. (Testimony before the U.S. - China Economic and Security Review Commission: "Access to Information and Media Control in the People's Republic of China", June 18, 2008) . http: //www. uscc. gov/hearings/2008hearings/written_ testimonies/08 06 18 wrts/08 06 18_ link_ statement, php.
10Guangqiu Xu. Anti - Western Nationalism in China, 1989 -99, World Affairs. Vol. 163, (Spring, 2001. ) pp. 155 - 156.

二级参考文献11

1殷方.论冷战后影响美国外交战略的几种西方国际关系理论[J].哈尔滨市委党校学报,2000(5):60-62. 被引量：2
2康香阁.哲学大师朱伯崑先生访谈录[J].邯郸学院学报,2005,15(1):5-7. 被引量：1
3塞缪尔·亨廷顿周琪等译.《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》[M].新华出版社,2002年.第171,173,175页.
4塞缪尔·亨廷顿.《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》[M].新华出版社,1999年.238页.
5张立文:《中华和合人文精神的现代价值》,见方立天、薛君度主编:《儒学与中国文化现代化》,中国人民大学出版社1998年版,第52页.
6三国魏·何晏,《论语集解》,四部丛刊初编本,上海商务印书馆1919年版.
7Michael Howard,The Lessons of History(New Haven,CT:Yale University Press,1991),p.176.
8Charles W.Kegley,Jr.,ed.,The Long Postwar Peace:Contending Explanation and Projections (New York:Harper Collins,1991),Introduction,p.8.
9詹姆斯·多尔蒂、小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫:《争论中的国际关系》,阎学通、陈寒溪等译,世界知识出版社2004年版,第5页.
10亨廷顿.《文明的冲突》[J].外交(美国),1993,.