期刊文献+

经营负债杠杆与金融负债杠杆效应的差异性检验 被引量:44

Study on the Difference between Operating Liabilities Leverage and Financing Liabilities Leverage
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文将企业的负债划分为经营负债与金融负债,以2001—2005年期间沪深两市A股上市公司为样本,比较检验了经营负债杠杆与金融负债杠杆对公司创值能力和成长性影响的差异性。结果发现:①经营负债杠杆比金融负债杠杆对公司的创值能力和成长性产生更大更显著的积极效应,即拥有更多的经营负债更能提升公司的创值能力和成长性;②两种负债的杠杆效应均存在"规模效应",即公司的规模越小,杠杆效应越强;③金融负债杠杆与经营负债杠杆具有显著的互补性,即随着金融负债杠杆比率的增加,经营负债杠杆效应会显著增强;反之亦然。显然,本文的研究结论对企业制定其负债安排策略具有一定的启示意义。 The paper divides the firm's liabilities into operating liabilities and financing liabilities,compares and tests the difference between operating liabilities leverage and financing leverage on the firm's value-creation ability and growth by sampling A-share listed firms from the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges for the period from 2001 to 2005.The results show that operating liabilities leverage produces more significant and positive effect than financing leverage on the value-creation ability and growth.That is holding higher operating liabilities more lever the firm's value-creation ability and growth.The leverage effect of two liabilities exists'Size Effect',that is the smaller the size is,the more leverage affect is.Financing leverage and operating liabilities leverage possess significant complementary nature.The conclusion is an instructive significance for the firms to design their liabilities strategy.
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第9期59-65,共7页 Accounting Research
基金 福建省教育厅社会科学研究项目(JA10054S) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金资助项目(09SJB630038) 南京审计学院校级项目(NSK2009/B13)
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献20

  • 1陈小悦,李晨.上海股市的收益与资本结构关系实证研究[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1995,32(1):72-79. 被引量:130
  • 2[1]Booth, L., V. Aivazian, A. Demirguc-Kunt. and V. Maksimovic,Capital structures in developing countries [ J ]. Journal of Finance,forthcoming, 2001.
  • 3[2]Chen, C. and P. Fanara, Jr., The choice among long-term financing instruments for public utilities [ J ]. Financial Review 27,431 ~ 465,1992.
  • 4[3]DeAngelo, H., and R. Masulis, Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics 8, 32 ~ 29,1980.
  • 5[4]Harris. M. and A. Raviv, The theory of capital structure [ J] .Jounral of Finance 46, 297 ~ 356,1991.
  • 6[5]Jensen, M., and W. Meckling, Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305 ~ 360,1976.
  • 7[6]Mackie-Mason. J.K., Do taxes affect corporate financing decisions[J]. Journal of Finance 45, 1471 ~ 93,1990.
  • 8[7]Miller, M., and F. Modigliani, Some estimates of the cost of capital to the utility industry[J] 1954 - 7. American Economic Review 56.333 ~ 391,1996.
  • 9[8]Myers, S.C., Determinants of corporate borrowing[J]. Journal of Financial Economics 5, 146 ~ 75,1977.
  • 10[9]Myers, S.C., and N.S. Majluf, Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have[ J ]Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187 ~ 221,1984.

共引文献422

同被引文献583

引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部