期刊文献+

基于线性抛物化稳定性方程的后掠翼边界层内横流稳定性研究 被引量:9

Investigation on Cross-flow Instabilities in Swept-wing Boundary Layers with Linear Parabolized Stability Equations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用有限差分法求解考虑模型曲率的线性抛物化稳定性方程(LPSE),分析无限展长后掠翼边界层内的横流驻波不稳定,并与实验结果进行对比,研究LPSE方法的模拟效果及其适用范围.研究表明,在横流驻波扰动增长的初期,LPSE能够准确的预测扰动的eN曲线,较好地描述边界层内的流动结构和扰动形态;当扰动增长到足够大时,扰动的高阶项不能再被忽略,LPSE的线性假设不再成立,需要采用非线性的方法(NPSE)来分析该状态.计算分析发现,模型曲率和边界层非平行性对后掠翼边界层内横流驻波的稳定性分析影响很大,影响程度与雷诺数无关.对于本文研究的模型,曲率对边界层内的横流扰动起着稳定的作用,而非平行性对扰动起不稳定的影响. Linear parabolized stability equations (LPSE) considering model curvature are solved with finite difference method. Stationary cross-flow instabilities in boundary layers of an infinite swept-wing are analyzed. LPSE and experimental results are compared. It is shown that at early development of stationary cross-flow disturbances, LPSE simulates flow structure and disturbance profiles well and predicts the N-factors accurately. When disturbances are amplified enough, high order terms can not be omitted and linearization assumption of LPSE is no longer suitable. Moreover, effects of model curvature and boundary layer non-parallelism are investigated. It shows that curvature and non-parallel terms have significant effects on stability analysis of stationary cross-flow instabilities on a swept-wing, and the effects are independent of Reynolds numbers. In the model investigated, inclusion of curvature has a stabilizing effect and non-parallelism shows destabilizing effects on disturbances.
出处 《计算物理》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第5期665-670,共6页 Chinese Journal of Computational Physics
关键词 线性抛物化稳定性方程 无限展长后掠翼 横流驻波不稳定 linear parabolized stability equations infinite swept wing stationary cross-flow instabilities
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Wang M J, Herbert T. PSE analysis of receptivity and stability in swept wing flows [ R]. AIAA-94-0180, 1994.
  • 2Deyhle H, Hohler G, Bippes H. Experimental investigation of instability wave propagation in a 3-D boundary-layer flow [ J]. AIAA J, 1993, 31(4) : 637 -645.
  • 3Bippes H. Basic experiments on transition in three-dimensional boundary layers dominated by crossflow instability [ J ]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1999, 135(4) : 363 -412.
  • 4Radeztsky R H, Reibert M S, Saric W S. Development of stationary crossflow vortices on a swept wing [ R]. AIAA-94-2373, 1994.
  • 5Reibert M S, Saric W S, Carrillo R B, Chapman K L. Experiments in nonlinear saturation of stationary crossflow vortices in a swept-wing boundary layer [ R]. AIAA-96-0184, 1996.
  • 6Haynes T S. Nonlinear stability and saturation of crossflow vortices in swept-wing boundary layer [ D]. Ph D diss. Arizona State University, 1996.
  • 7Reed H L, Saric W S. CFD validation issues for boundary-layer stability and transition [ R]. AIAA 2003-3441, 2003.
  • 8Herbert T. Parabolized stability equations [ R]. AGARD-R-793, VKI Rhode-saint-Genese, Belgium, 1993.
  • 9Li F, Malik M R. On the nature of PSE approximation [J]. Theoret Comput Fluid Dynamics, 1996, 8:253 -273.
  • 10Herbert T. Parabolized stability equations [ J]. Annu Rev Fluid Meeh, 1997, 29 : 245 - 283.

同被引文献70

引证文献9

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部