期刊文献+

治疗2型糖尿病3种用药方案的成本-效果分析 被引量:10

Cost-effectiveness analysis of 3 different drugs in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较3种用药方案治疗2型糖尿病药物的成本-效果。方法:将204例2型糖尿病患者随机分成三组,分别用A(阿卡波糖组),B(格列齐特组)和C(吡格列酮组)治疗。结果:A、B、C组药物治疗成本分别是632.52元、245.28元、442.68元,对空腹血糖的总有效率为79.41%、77.27%、68.57%,成本效果比分别是796.52、317.43、645.59。对餐后2h血糖的总有效率为86.76%、84.85%、81.43%,成本效果比分别是741.61、289.07、534.25。A、C组相对于B组的增量成本-效果比分别(空腹血糖/餐后2h血糖)为180.95/202.74、22.69/57.72。结论:三组用药方案都能将血糖控制在相对理想范围,就经济成本分析,以B组用药方案是3种方案中最具临床推广价值的治疗方案。 Objective:To discuss the cost-effectiveness of 3 different drugs in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods:204 cases with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to 3 groups.Group A was treated with Acarbose;group B was treated with Gliclazide and group C was treated with Pioglitazone.Results:The treatment costs for A,B and C 3 schemes were 632.52,245.28 and 442.68 yuan respectively;the total effective rates on blood-fasting sugar were 79.41%,77.27% and 68.57% respectively,the cost-effectiveness of the three rates on blood-fasting sugar were 796.52,317.43 and 645.59 respectively.The total effective rates on blood sugar 2 hours after meal on blood-fasting sugar were 86.76%,84.85% and 81.43% respectively,the cost-effectiveness of the three rates on blood sugar 2 hours after meal on blood-fasting sugar were 729.05,289.07 and 543.63 respectively.The cost-effectiveness ratio increments of scheme(FPG/2 hPG) A and C were 180.95/202.74,22.69/57.72.Conclusion:Blood sugar level can be controlled to an ideal level through the three treatment schemes,analysis of the economic costs,B group therapy programs are the most valuable clinical treatment programs of three treatment schemes.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2010年第27期116-118,共3页 China Medical Herald
关键词 2型糖尿病 口服降糖药 成本-效果分析 Non-insulin dependent Oral antidiabetic drugs Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献14

共引文献535

同被引文献47

  • 1孔晓东.药物经济学:概念、方法和应用[J].国外医学(药学分册),1994,21(1):13-18. 被引量:429
  • 2武晋晓,谷华娟.口服降糖药物的联合应用[J].实用糖尿病杂志,2006,2(3):54-55. 被引量:16
  • 3林华,王颖彦.4种口服降糖药治疗2型糖尿病的成本-效果分析[J].安徽医药,2006,10(8):634-635. 被引量:13
  • 4Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development of longterm complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [J]. N Engl J Med, 1993,329:977-986.
  • 5UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UDPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complication in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS) [J]. Lancet,1998,352:837-853.
  • 6American Diabetes Association. Clinical practice recommendations [J]. Diabcctcs Care,2003,26(Suppl1):S33-S50.
  • 7Lee WC, Conner C, Hammer M. Results of a model analysis of the cost-effectiveness of liraglutide versus exenatide added to metformin,glimepiride,or both for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in the United States. ClinTher,2010,32 (10) : 1756.
  • 8St Charles M, Minshall ME, Pandya B J, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of pioglitazone plus metformin compared with rosiglitazone plus mefformin from a third-party payer perspective in the US. Curr Med Res Opin,2009,25 (6) : 1343.
  • 9Palmer JL, Beaudet A, White J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in China. Adv Ther,2010,27 (11) :814.
  • 10叶任高.内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.721-723.

引证文献10

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部