期刊文献+

跨国合作组织间信任修复:基于制度与文化视角的分析 被引量:7

Trust Repair in Transnational Cooperation Organization:Analysis Based on Institutional and Cultural Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在世界经济一体化发展的今天,组织间跨国合作日益深化,而信任危机是制约组织成功进行跨国合作的重要因素,因此,跨国合作组织间信任修复是一个亟须深入探讨的问题。组织间信任修复的落脚点依然是个体,但修复对象的选择需要考虑众多组织因素。制度和文化的差异对跨国合作组织间信任修复具有非常重要的影响,制度差异影响信任者倾向,文化差异影响归因过程和可信赖性感知。跨国合作组织间信任修复需要在了解对方组织特点、制度背景和文化背景的基础上,审慎地选择信任修复的对象、措施和方式。 In today’s integrated world economy, the transnational cooperation among the organizations is deepening. Trust crisis is the important factor restricting the successful international cooperation. So, trust repair among the cross-border cooperation organizations is an issue needed to explore deeply. The foothold of the trust repair among organizations is still the individual. However, the choice of the repaired objects needs to consider a number of organizational factors. The institutional and cultural differences will impact the trust repair between cross-border cooperation organizations. The institutional differences will affect the trust propensity, while the cultural differences will affect the attributive process and the perceived trustworthiness. Trust repair among international cooperation organizations needs to choose the objects, measures and methods carefully, after understanding the organizational characteristics, institutional and cultural background of the target party.
作者 钱海燕 杨忠
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《江海学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期89-93,共5页 Jianghai Academic Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目"转型经济下我国企业人力资源管理若干问题研究"(项目号:70732002) 国家自然科学基金项目"知识转移困境:知识特性 知识所有权与组织激励"(项目号:70872044)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1罗德里克·克雷默(Roderick M.Kramer) 石小竹(翻译).反思信任[J].商业评论,2009(7):42-55. 被引量:1
  • 2Gillespie,N.& Dietz,G.,"Trust Repair After an Organization-Level Failure",Academy of Management Review,2009,34(1),pp.127-145.
  • 3Tomlinson,E.C.& Mayer,R.C.,"The Role of Causal Attribution Dimension in Trust Repair",Academy of Management Review,2009,34(1),pp.85-104.
  • 4Gillespie,N.& Dietz,G.,"Trust Repair After an Organization Level Failure",Academy of Management Review,2009,34(1),pp.127-145.
  • 5Bottom,W.P.,Gibson,K.,Daniels,S.E.& Murnighan,J.K.,"When Talk is not Cheap:Substantive Penance and Expressions of Intent in Rebuilding Cooperation",Organization Science,2002,13(5),pp.497-513.
  • 6Tomlinson,E.C.&Mayer,R.C.,"The Role of Causal Attribution Dimension in Trust Repair",Academy of Management Review,2009,34(1),pp.85-104.
  • 7Kim,P.H.,Dirks,K.T.& Cooper,C.D.,"The Repair of Trust:A Dynamic Bilateral Perspective and Multilevel Conceptualization",Academy of Management Review,2009,34(3),pp.401-422.
  • 8Currall,S.C.& Inkpen,A.C.,"A Multilevel Approach to Trust in Joint Ventures",Journal of International Business Studies,2002,33(3),pp.479-495.
  • 9Weiner,B.,"An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion",Psychological Review,1985,92(4),pp.548-573.
  • 10Mayer,R.C.,Davis,J.H.& Schoorman,F.D.,"An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust",The Academy of Management Review,1995,20(3),pp.709-734.

共引文献1

同被引文献129

  • 1孔晓春.管理层披露重大内控缺陷动机研究——基于信任修复理论视角[J].现代管理科学,2013,1(7):110-112. 被引量:2
  • 2陈松林.信任源理论在医患关系管理中的运用[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(12):826-828. 被引量:16
  • 3MCLEAN B.Is Enron Overpriced?[J].Fortune,2001,143(5):122-125.
  • 4DEUTSCH M.Trust and Suspicion[J].The Journal of Con-flict Resolution,1958,2(4):265-279.
  • 5DEUTSCH M.The Effect of Motivational Orientation upon Trust and Suspicion[J].Human Relations,1960,13(2):123-139.
  • 6LEWICKI R J,BUNKER B.Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships[M]//KRAMER R M,TYLER T R.Trust in Organizations:Frontiers of Theory and Re-search.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications,1996:114-139.
  • 7TOMLINSON E C,DINEEN B R,LEWICKI R J.The Road to Reconciliation:Antecedents of Victim Willingness to Rec-oncile Following a Broken Promise[J].Journal of Manage-ment,2004,30(2):165-187.
  • 8KIM P H,FERRIN D L,COOPER C D,DIRKS K T.Remo-ving the Shadow of Suspicion:The Effects of Apology VS.Denial for Repairing Ability-VS.Integrity-Based Trust Vio-lations[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2004,89(1):104-118.
  • 9SCHWEITZER M E,HERSHEY J C,BRADLOW E T.Promises and Lies:Restoring Violated Trust[J].Organiza-tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2006,101(1):1-19.
  • 10FERRIN D L,KIM P H,COOPER C D,DIRKS K T.Si-lence Speaks Volumes:The Effectiveness of Reticence in Comparison to Apology and Denial for Responding to Integri-ty-and Competence-Based Trust Violations[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2007,92(4):893-908.

引证文献7

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部