期刊文献+

莫匹罗星在腹部切口感染治疗中的临床价值 被引量:1

Efficacy of mupirocin in treatment of abdominal wound infection.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨莫匹罗星在腹部切口感染治疗中的临床价值。方法收集我院普外科2009年1月至2010年1月各种腹部手术后发生切口感染42例,随机分为实验组及对照组。实验组常规清创后涂抹莫匹罗星软膏并凡士林纱条覆盖创面,对照组常规清创后以碘仿纱条填塞伤口。结果对照组患者切口感染治疗时间为9~17 d,平均(10.2±4.7)d,愈合时间23~29 d,平均(25.3±2.7)d。实验组患者切口感染治疗时间为5~8 d,平均(4.7±2.6)d,愈合时间为10~16 d,平均(12.4±2.1)d。两组比较,术后切口感染平均治疗时间和平均愈合时间差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论莫匹罗星在术后伤口感染治疗中安全,有效,能明显缩短治疗时间,值得在临床应用中推广。 Objective To study the efficacy of mupirocin in treatment of abdominal wound infection.Methods Forty two patients with abdominal wound infection after surgery treated in the Department of General Surgery during January 2009 to January 2010 were randomly allocated into trial group and control group.The wounds in patients of trial group were treated with conventional smearing of mupirocin ointment and vaseline sand covering the wound surface after debridement,and the wounds of patients in control group were treated by conventional debridement and iodoform packing sand.Results In patients of control group,the duration of treatment for wound infection was 9~16 d with an average of(10.2±3.7)d and the healing time was 23~29 d with an average of(25.3±2.7) d.In patients of trial group,the duration of treatment for wound infection was 5~8 d with an average of(4.7±2.6)d,and the healing time was 10 to 16 days with an average of(12.4±2.1)d.The difference in average treatment duration of postoperative infection and average healing time between these two groups was significant(P0.01).Conclusion Mupirocin in treatment of postoperative wound infection is safe and effective,it can significantly shorten the duration of treatment and it is worthy to be recommended for clinical application.
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2010年第19期1462-1463,共2页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
关键词 切口感染 莫匹罗星 术后并发症 治疗 Wound infection Mupirocin Postoperative complications Treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献32

  • 1朱马拜,叶尔江,郭永忠,赛力克,别克,热衣汗.腹部手术切口脂肪液化的临床分析[J].腹部外科,2004,17(6):347-348. 被引量:40
  • 2刘红卫,陈宏峰.术后切口迟发脓肿21例主要原因分析[J].中国厂矿医学,2005,18(4):323-323. 被引量:1
  • 3何纪富.腹壁切口迟发脓肿四例分析[J].临床外科杂志,1996,4(4):195-195. 被引量:2
  • 4Riet M,Steyerberg E,Nellensteyn J,et al.Meta-analysis of technique for closure of midline abdominal incisions[J].Br J Surg,2002,89(11):1350-1356.
  • 5Weiland DE,Bay RC,Del SS.et al.Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis[J].Am J Surg,1998,176 (6):666 -670.
  • 6Sorensen LT,Hemmingsen U,Kallehave F,et al.Risk factors for tissue and wound complications in gastrointestinal surgery[J].Ann Surg,2005,241 (4):654-658.
  • 7Riou JP,Cohen JR,Johnson H Jr.Factors influencing wound dehiscence[J].Am J Surg,1992,163 (3):324-330.
  • 8Israelsson LA,Jonsson T.Overweight and healing of midline incisions:the importance of suture technique[J].Eur J Surg,1997,163(3):175-180.
  • 9Khan MN,Naqvi AH,Irshad K,et al.Frequency and risk factor of abdominal wound dehiscence[J].J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2004,14(6):355 -357.
  • 10Col C,Soran A,Col M.Can postoperative abdominal wound dehiscence be predicted?[J].Tokai J Exp Clin Med,1998,23(3):123 -127.

共引文献408

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部