摘要
法实证主义理论中的"人类形象"着重于"个人"的分析与建构。由于哲学基础和方法论立场的不同,此种对于"个人"的分析与建构存在着很多差异:边沁和奥斯丁的功利化表达立足于经验哲学和功利主义;凯尔森的符号化表达立足于新康德主义哲学;哈特的去功利化表达则是在面对现代道德哲学的挑战时所作出的让步。通过对"个人"的形象在法实证主义理论中的学术史考察,我们可以展示出法实证主义的人学维度。
The fundamental task of legal theory studies is to establish ＂human image＂. ＂Human image＂ elaborated in legal positivism emphasizes the analysis and construction of person. Owing to distinctions between philosophical ground and methodological position, there exist many differences in terms of analysis and construction of person among various thinkers. Bentham and Austin＇ s expression of utilized person is based on empirical philosophy and utilitarianism, Kelsen＇ s expression of symbolized person is based on neo-Kantianism and Hart＇ s expression of de-utilized person actually is a compromise made when facing the challenge of modern moral philosophy. We can show the humanist dimension of legal positivism through the examination of person in intellectual history of legal positivism.
出处
《环球法律评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期43-54,共12页
Global Law Review
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目"学习实践科学发展观重大问题研究--以人为本与中国法制发展"(项目编号:08&ZD001)的子课题"以人为本的法思想史考察"的阶段性成果
