论“互动假说”的发展与局限被引量：14

On the Development of the Interaction Hypothesis and Its Limitations

导出

摘要本文从互动概念出发,讨论由Long首先提出的互动假说的内涵及其目前的更新和发展,探讨其局限性,旨在更好地了解互动在二语习得过程中的作用。 Drawn on the understanding of the concept of interaction, this paper discusses the theory of the Interaction Hypothesis first proposed by Long and explores its development and limitations in an attempt to better understand the role of interaction in the complex process of L2 acquisition.

作者顾伟勤

机构地区上海外国语大学

出处《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期94-97,共4页 Foreign Language Research

关键词互动假说意义协商互动式调整的输入预先调整的输入二语习得 Interaction Hypothesis negotiation interactionally-modified input premodified input second language acquisition

分类号 H319.3 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献13

1顾伟勤.不同课堂教学模式对二语词汇习得影响的一项对比实验研究[J].外语电化教学,2008(5):45-50. 被引量：1
2Gass, S. Input, Interaction and the Second Language Learner [ M ]. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
3Krashen, S. Comprehensible Output? [J]. System, 1998 (26).
4Long, M. Native Speaker/Non-native Speaker Conversation and the Negotiation of Comprehensible Input [ J ]. Applied Linguistics, 1983 (4).
5Long, M. Input and Second Language Acquisition Theory [A]. In S. Gass and C. Madden (eds). Input in Second Language Acquisition [ C ]. Rowley, MA : Newbury House, 1985.
6Long, M. The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition [ A ]. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (eds) , Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C]. San Diego: Academic Press, 1996.
7Loschky, L. Comprehensible Input and Second Language Acquisition: What is the Relationship? [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1994 (16).
8Nobuyoshi, J. & Ellis, R. Focussed Communication Tasks [ J ]. English Language Teaching Journal, 1993 (47).
9Pica, T. The Essential Role of Negotiation in the Communicative Classroom [ J ]. JALT Journal, 1996 ( 78 ).
10Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. The Impact of Interaction on Comprehension [ J ]. TESOL Quarterly, 1987 (21).

二级参考文献16

1Coady, J. & Huckin, T(eds. ). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
2Ellis, R. & He, X. The Roles of Modified Input and Output in the Incidental Acquisition of Word Meanings[ J ]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1999,21:285 -301.
3Ellis, R. Learning a Second Language Through Interaction [ M ]. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999.
4Fender, J. A Review of L1 and L2/ESL Word IntegrationDevelopment Involved in Lower-Level Text Processing [ J ]. Language Learning,2001,51:319 - 396.
5Gass, S. & Selinker, L. Second Language Acquisition - An Introductory Course (2nd ed. ) [ M ]. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,2001.
6Hatch, E. & Brown, C. Vocabulary, Semantics, and Language Education [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1997.
7Izumi, S. Comprehension and Production Processes in L2 Learning: In Search of the Psycholinguistic Rationale of the Output Hypothesis[ J]. Applied Linguistics,2003,24/2 : 168 - 196.
8Johnson, K. An Introduction to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching [ M ]. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 2001.
9Krashen, S. We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading: Additional Evidence for the Input Hypothesis [ J]. Modem Language Journal, 1989,73:440 - 464.
10Long, M. The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia ( eds), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [ M ]. San Diego : Academic Press, 1996.