期刊文献+

环境规制、要素禀赋与产业国际竞争力的实证研究——基于中国制造业的面板数据 被引量:452

A Case Study on the Environmental Regulation,the Factor Endowment and the International Competitiveness in Industries
原文传递
导出
摘要 环境规制严格度是否是中国工业制成品比较优势的决定因素?严格的环境规制是否影响中国污染产业的国际竞争力?对上述问题的回答有助于加快我国贸易发展方式的转变和缓解资源环境压力。环境规制政策和要素禀赋是一国比较优势的两个主要因素,而两者对专业化分工的作用是不同的。本文使用1996~2004年我国24个制造业的面板数据并通过构造综合反映我国实际情况的产业环境规制指标和产业污染密度指标,对环境规制效应、要素禀赋效应与产业国际竞争力的作用机制进行了分析。所得主要结论如下:通过对比较优势指标和污染强度的分析,得出我国污染密集型行业并不具有绝对比较优势,因而我国并不是发达国家的"污染避难所"。环境规制、物质资本和人力资本指标均对比较优势产生负面影响,且环境规制的二次项与比较优势正相关,这表明环境规制对比较优势的影响呈"U"型。 Is the degree of stringency of environmental regulations the determinants of the comparative advantage of China's industrial manufactured goods? Does this stringency impact on the international competitiveness of China's industries that pollute the environment? The answer to the above questions is conducive to quickening the transformation of China' s growth mode of trade and to relieving the pressure of environment and resources.Environmental regulations and factor endowments are the two elements of a country's comparative advantage,and their decisive impact on specialization is different.In this paper,we have used the panel data of 1996-2004 on China's 24 manufacturing industries and constructed the index of the industrial environmental regulations and the index of the intensity of industrial pollution,both of which comprehensively reflect Chin's actuality,to analyze the effect of the environmental regulations,the effect of factor endowments and the mechanism of the function of the industrial international competitiveness.The main conclusions are as follows:by the analyses of the indexes of comparative advantages and the pollution intensity,we have discovered that China' s pollution-intensive industries have no comparative advantages and that,therefore,China does not allow herself to be a'pollution haven'of developed countries.The indexes of environmental regulations,the physical capital and the human capital—all have negative effect on comparative advantages.In addition,there is a positive correlation between the quadratic term of environmental regulations and comparative advantages,which demonstrate that U-shaped is the impact of environmental regulations on comparative advantages.
出处 《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第10期87-98,共12页 Journal of Management World
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70703015)"环境规制 要素禀赋和产业国际竞争力的理论与实证研究" 国家社科基金重大项目(09&ZD021)"应对国际资源环境变化挑战及加快经济发展方式转变" 教育部重大攻关课题(08JZD0014)"中国现代产业体系研究"资助 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金的研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Antweiler, B., Copeland and M. Taylor, 2001, "Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?", American Economic Review, Vol.91,pp.887-04.
  • 2Baumol, W. J., Oates, W. E., 1988, The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge University Press.
  • 3Chichilnisky, C., 1994, "North-South Trade and the Global Environment", American Economic Review, Vol.84,pp. 851-74.
  • 4Cole M. A. and R. J. R. Elliott, 2003, "Determining the Trade-environment Composition Effect: the Role of Capital,Labor and Environmental Regulations", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46, pp.363-383.
  • 5Cole, M. A., Robert J. R. Elliott and Kenichi Shimamoto, 2005, "Why the Grass is not Always Greener: the Competing Effects of Environmental Regulations and Factor Intensities on US Specialization", Ecological Economics ,54( 1 ) ,pp.95-109.
  • 6Cole, M. A., Robert J. R. Elliott and Toshi Okubo, 2010, "Trade, Environmental Regulations and Industrial Mobility: An Industry-Level Study for Japan",WCERE 2010 paper.
  • 7Copeland, B. R. and Taylor, M. S., 1994, "North-South Trade and the Environment", Quarterly Journal of Economics,Vol. 109,pp.755-787.
  • 8Copeland, B. R. and Taylor, M. S., 2005, "Trade, Growth and the environment", University of British Columbia, Working Paper, No.1222.
  • 9Dasgupta., 1995, "Environmental Regulation and Development", World Bank Working Paper, Washington, D.C..
  • 10Ederington, J. and Minier, J., 2003, "Is Environmental Policy a Secondary Trade Barrier? An Empirical Analysis", Canadian Journal of Economics,Vol.36, pp.137-54.

二级参考文献26

  • 1李明桓.我国环境保护法律与可持续发展[J].辽宁行政学院学报,2006,8(4):20-21. 被引量:3
  • 2-.《中华人民共和国海关统计年鉴》[M].,1991-2001..
  • 3-.《中国环境年鉴》[M].,1991-2001各年出版..
  • 4Barrett, S. International Cooperation for Sale[J]. European Economic Review, 2001, (45).
  • 5Bosetti, V., and J. Frankel. Global Climate Policy Architecture and Political Feasibility: Specific Formulas and Emission Targets to Attain 460ppm CO2 Concentrations[R]. NBER Working Paper No. 15516, 2009.
  • 6Eskeland, G., and A. Harrison. Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution-haven Hypothesis [R]. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1744, 1997.
  • 7Feldstein,M. The Exploding Carbon Tax[J]. The Weekly Standard, 2009,(22).
  • 8Jiang, K., A. Cosbey, and D. Murphy. Embedded Carbon in Traded Goods[R]. Paper Prepared for the Seminar on Trade and Climate Change, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008,(18-20).
  • 9Jordan-Korte, K., and S. Mildner. Climate Protection and Border Tax Adjustment: Economic Rationale and Political Pitfalls of Current U.S. Cap-and-Trade Proposals[R]. FACET Analysis No.l, 2008.
  • 10Mendelsohn, R. Is the Stern Review an Economic Analysis [J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2008, (2).

共引文献127

同被引文献5173

引证文献452

二级引证文献6513

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部