期刊文献+

抗冲击性人工髋关节的生物力学比较 被引量:2

Biomechanics research about anti-impacted femoral prosthesis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨自研设计的抗冲击性人工髋关节的生物力学特点及其意义。方法以新鲜人尸股骨为对照组,取其相关生物力学参数后在股骨距上12mm处截骨,将自研设计的抗冲击性人工髋关节假体(以下简称抗冲击性假体)和最常用的型人工髋关节假体(Moore型假体)分别安装在新鲜人尸股骨上,固定后分别测试两组在静态时的应力分布状况及动态时的冲击载荷的大小。结果抗冲击性假体的应变值的分布接近于股骨对照组,抗冲击性仅体所承受冲击载荷远大于Moore型假体。结论自研设计的抗冲击性假体更符合生物力学要求。 To investigate the function and significance of biomechanics about anti-impacted femoralprosthesis.Methods 10 cases fresh femoral specimens were as control, before hed osteotomy of femur fore 12 mm lessertrochanter.After osteotomy, all specimens were divided into two test group consisting of five specimens in which the antiimpacted femoral prosthesis and the Moore femoral prosthesis were installed respectively . After fixed prosthesis, the strain distribution and impact load about two test groups were measured. Results The strain distribution of the anti - impacted femoralprosthesis approached the control group and the impact load of the anti - impaacted femoral prosthesis was superior to that ofMoore femoral prosthesis Conclusion Anti-impacted femoral prosthesis is superior to Moore femoral prosthesis in the straindistribution and beared the impact load.
机构地区 解放军第
出处 《广东医学》 CAS CSCD 1999年第5期324-326,共3页 Guangdong Medical Journal
关键词 人工髋关节 生物力学 应变值 冲击载荷 Femoral-prosthesis Biomechanics Strain Impact load
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献11

同被引文献21

  • 1崔鹏,赵鉴非,VictorL Fornasier.骨关节病患者股骨距区域骨密度测量分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(4):243-245. 被引量:3
  • 2张正廉,孙俊英,孙康.聚醚醚酮髋股骨头假体置换术后股骨近段的力学分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(4):276-280. 被引量:1
  • 3胡侦明,罗先正.髋关节的生物力学[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(7):498-500. 被引量:31
  • 4付国太,刘洪军,张柏,韩光鹤.PEEK的特性及应用[J].工程塑料应用,2006,34(10):69-71. 被引量:51
  • 5谢建荣,张爱平,郑明.人工髋关节界面的应力研究进展[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(12):1029-1030. 被引量:2
  • 6Williams DF,McNamara A,Turner RM.Potential of polyetheretherketone(PEEK) and carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK in medical applications.J Mater Sci Lett.1987; 6:188-190.
  • 7An YH,Woolf SK,Friedman RJ.Pre-clinical in vivo evaluation of orthopaedic bioabsorbable devices.Biomaterials.2000;21(24):2635-2652.
  • 8Meyer MR,Friedman RJ,Del Schutte H Jr,et al.Long-term durability of the interface in FRP composites after exposure to simulated physiologic saline environments.J Biomed Mater Res.1994;28(10):1221.
  • 9Kurtz SM,Devine JN.PEEK biomaterials in trauma,orthopedic,and spinal implants.Biomaterials.2007;28(32):4845-4869.
  • 10Vadapalli S,Sairyo K,Goel VK,et al.Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2006;31(26):992-998.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部