4种医学图书情报学期刊的多指标综合评价研究

Overall evaluation of four medical and information science journals with multiple indicators

利用中国知网"中国学术期刊评价统计分析平台"、《中国期刊引证报告:扩刊版》和《中国学术期刊评价研究报告:RCCSE权威、核心期刊排行榜与指南》的相关数据,计算2001-2008年《中华医学图书情报杂志》、《预防医学情报杂志》、《医学信息学杂志》和《医学信息》的H指数和G指数,通过24个项目95条数据的综合评价,《中华医学图书情报杂志》得分最少,质量较好,其他依次排名是《预防医学情报杂志》、《医学信息学杂志》和《医学信息》。研究证明,评价数据来源不同,评价的结果会出现差异;期刊分类不同,评价的结果也各有所异。

H and G factors of 4 medical and information science journals from 2001 to 2008 were calculated according to the relative parameters covered inCNKI , China journal citation report： extended edition , andChinese academic journal report： RCCSE authority and core journals list and guide , ranked and scored, respectively. Total score of each journal was calculated and the 4 journals were ranked according to their score. The score of Chinese journal of medical library and information science was the lowest, followed by Journal of preventive medicine infor- mation ,Journal of medical informatics , andMedieal information . The results of this study indicate that multiple indicators can improve the accuracy in journal evaluation and the evaluation outcome is different due to the data from different resources and different journal classifications.