期刊文献+

未化疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌患者吉西他滨联合顺铂诱导化疗后口服依托泊苷维持治疗疗效评估(英文)

Assessment of maintenance oral Etoposide following induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplating in chemonaive extensive small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective:The aim of our study was to evaluate the response and tolerability to treatment when using gemcitabine-cisplatin combination(GC),followed by maintenance therapy of oral etoposide for non-progressive patients in trial to improve progression free survival and overall survival.Methods:Thirty nine patients with extensive small cell lung cancer(SCLC) and ECOG ≤ 2 received 4 cycles of chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2(day 1 and 8) cisplating 75 mg/m2(day 1) every three weeks.Twenty seven non-progressive patients after 4 cycles of chemotherapy were randomized either to receive oral etoposide 50 mg/m2 for consecutive 15 days every 3 weeks vs no therapy for three months or progression.Results:Thirty nine eligible patients treated with GC,27 non progressive patients were subsequently randomized to oral etoposide or observation.Median follow-up was 18 months.The overall response rate to GC was 59% and toxicity to oral etoposide was mild.There was improvement in median progression-free survival(PFS) favoring the maintenance arm of 10.5 months vs 7 months(P < 0.05).Median overall survival(OS) had improved towards the maintenance arm(13 vs 11.5 months).One year survival(60% vs 24%),18 months survival(20% vs 5%) favoring the maintenance.Multivariate analysis revealed that age,performance status,maintenance therapy,and response to treatment were independent prognostic factors for OS.Age,maintenance therapy,and response to treatment were highly significant factors for PFS.Conclusion:Gemcitabine-cisplatin is an effective and tolerable regiment for extensive disease of SCLC.The addition of 3 months of oral etoposide in non progressing patients was associated with a significant improvement of PFS and longer OS. Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the response and tolerability to treatment when using gemcitabine-cisplatin combination (GC), followed by maintenance therapy of oral etoposide for non-progressive patients in trial to improve progression free survival and overall survival. Methods: Thirty nine patients with extensive small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and ECOG ≤ 2 received 4 cycles of chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 (day 1 and 8) cisplating 75 mgim2 (day 1) every three weeks. Twenty seven non-progressive patients after 4 cycles of chemotherapy were randomized either to receive oral etoposide 50 mg/m^2 for consecutive 15 days every 3 weeks vs no therapy for three months or progression. Results: Thirty nine eligible patients treated with GC, 27 non progressive patients were subsequently randomized to oral etoposide or observation. Median follow-up was 18 months. The overall response rate to GC was 59% and toxicity to oral etoposide was mild. There was improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) favoring the maintenance arm of 10.5 months vs 7 months (P 〈 0.05). Median overall survival (OS) had improved towards the maintenance arm (13 vs 11.5 months). One year survival (60% vs 24%), 18 months survival (20% vs 5%) favoring the maintenance. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, performance status, maintenance therapy, and response to treatment were independent prognostic factors for OS. Age, maintenance therapy, and response to treatment were highly significant factors for PFS. Conclusion: Gemcitabine-cisplatin is an effective and tolerable regiment for extensive disease of SCLC. The addition of 3 months of oral etoposide in non progressing patients was associated with a significant improvement of PFS and longer OS.
出处 《The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology》 CAS 2010年第10期569-573,共5页 中德临床肿瘤学杂志(英文版)
关键词 口服 肺癌 细胞 化疗 维修 评估 诱导 gemcitabine cisplatin small cell lung cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Hann C,Rudin C.Management of small-cell lung cancer:incremental changes but hope for the future.Oncology,2008,22:1486-1492.
  • 2Alberg AJ,Samet JM.Epidemiology of lung cancer.Chest,2003,123:21S-49S.
  • 3Demedts IK,Vermaelen KY,Van meerbeeck JR Treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung carcinoma:current status and future prospects.Eur Respir K,2010,35:202-215.
  • 4Sundstrom S,Bremnes RM,Kaasas S,et al.Cisplatin and etoposide regimen is superior to cyclophosphanide,epirubicin,and vincristine regimen in small cell lung cancer:results form a randomized phase Ⅲ trial with 5 years follow-up.J Clin Oncol,2002,20:4665-4672.
  • 5Noda K,Nishiwaki Y,Kawahara M,et al.Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etopposide plus cisplatin for extensive small cell lung cancer.N Engl J Med,2002,346:86-91.
  • 6Allen J,Jahanzeb M.Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer:evolution of systemic therapy and future directions.Clin Lung Cancer,2008,9:262-270.
  • 7Albain KS,Crowley J J,LeBlanc M,et al.Determinants of improved outcome in small-cell lung cancer:an analysis of the 2,580-patient Southwest Oncology Group database,J Clin Oncol,2002,8:1563-1574.
  • 8Hanna NH,Sandler AB,Loehrer PJ Sr,et al.Maintenance daily oral etoposide versus no further therapy following induction chemotherapy with etoposide plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin in extensive smallcell lung cancer:A Hossier Oncology Group randomized study.Ann Oncol,2002,13:95-102.
  • 9Casciato DA.Principles of oncology.In:Manual of Clinical Oncology,Fifth Edition.Phyladelphia:Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins,2004.1-9.
  • 10Casciato DA.Toxicities of chemotherapy:NCl-Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.In:Manual of Clinical Oncology,Fifth Edition.Phyladelphia:Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins,2004.696-703.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部