期刊文献+

群决策在目标主机安全性能评价中的应用

Application of group decision making in the target computer′s security capability evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对目标主机安全性能影响因素中评价信息为区间数的不确定性问题,基于方案偏好向量与方案综合向量之间范数最小的原理,构建目标主机安全性能评价因素权重确定模型,解决了包含不确定性信息的目标主机安全性能权重确定问题;运用连续有序加权算子C-OWA将决策信息为区间数的评价信息集结为实数,简化了该模型的运算.计算结果表明该方法实用性强,操作简便,很好处理了目标主机安全性中存在不确定性因素的问题. According to the fact that the evaluation information is uncertain with interval numbers in the influential factors of target host′s security performance,the model is established to determine the factor weigh in the security performance evaluation of target host which contains uncertain information based on the norms minimum principle between the preference vector and integrate value vector of alternatives.Then,the model is simplified applying the C-OWA operators to aggregate the interval numbers to the real numbers.The calculated results indicate that this method has the characteristics such as strong practicability,simple and convenient operation,and could deal with the uncertain problem very well in the security performance evaluation of target host.
作者 梁晓茹
出处 《纺织高校基础科学学报》 CAS 2010年第2期247-250,共4页 Basic Sciences Journal of Textile Universities
基金 西安市教育局教师教育科研资助项目(09科教335)
关键词 目标主机 安全性能评价 群决策 区间数 target computer security capability evaluation group decision making interval
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献41

  • 1王子强,刘海燕,李媛州.Unix主机漏洞扫描系统的原理与实现[J].计算机工程与设计,2005,26(2):426-428. 被引量:4
  • 2邵立嵩,刘海燕,张佐.基于信任关系的脆弱性扫描系统的设计与实现[J].计算机应用,2005,25(B12):145-147. 被引量:1
  • 3[1]Ortalo R, Deswarte Y, Kaaniche M. Experimenting with Quantitative Evaluation Tools for Monitoring Operational Security. LAAS Report 96369, 1997-01
  • 4[2]Barker R, Kelly G. The Vulnerability Instantiation Methodology Prototype. Information Security Technical R eport, 1998, 13:79-86
  • 5[3]Saaty T L . How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 1(48): 9-26
  • 6[4]Miksell S, Nainis W S, James H M.Security Vulnerability Assessment Tools for Internet Applications. White Paper, Information Technology Support Center, 2001-03
  • 7Forman E,Peniwati K. Aggregating individual judgments and priories with the analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1998,108:165~169.
  • 8Chiclana F,Herrera F,Herrera V E. Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations[J]. Fuzzy sets and Systems,1998,97:33~48.
  • 9Fan Z P, Xiao S H, Hu G F. An optimization method for integrating two kinds of preference information in group decision-making[J]. Computer & Industrial engineering,2004,46:329~335.
  • 10Mikhailov L. Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method[J]. Computers & Operations Research,2004,31:293~301.

共引文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部