摘要
避险行为所指向的法益大小能否等于避险行为所保护的法益在刑法学界争论很大。从紧急避险的本质理论出发进行论证是解决这个问题的一个重要方法。本文以紧急避险本质为视角分析作为避险对象的法益大小能否等于避险行为所保护的法益等问题,并进一步从紧急避险本质理论出发,从另一个角度对生命权、健康权能够作为紧急避险的避险对象的观点加以论证,以期通过理论的创新和完善,对立法、司法起到一定的指导作用。
It is highly controversial in the academic field of criminal law that whether the legal interests protected by Danger Prevention behaviour outweigh those directed by it.Scholars,holding a positive or negative attitude,have researched into this topic with various methods from different perspectives to support their views.As far as I observe,the key to address this issue is to approach it from its very definition.This paper,from the nature of UDP theory,proves from another perspective that right of life and right of health can also be the objects of Danger Prevention behaviour.It calso interprets the theory involved in Urgent Danger Prevention and excessive Danger Prevention,which will in turn shed light on the improvement of legislation and judicature.
出处
《西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2010年第5期38-43,共6页
Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences
基金
2009年度教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区规划基金项目(09XJA820009)
关键词
紧急避险
利益衡量
生命权
健康权
避险过当
Urgent Danger Prevention
balance of Interest
right of Life
right of health
excessive danger prevention