中国行业体制改革的成败新论:新自由主义的视角

A New Discussion on the Success and the Failure of China's Industry System Reform:From the Perspective of New Liberalism

20世纪70年代初随着新自由主义的兴起,经济管理行业化成为席卷全球的浪潮,无论是资本主义国家,还是社会主义国家都纷纷走上行业体制改革之路,英美模式更是被封为典范。但是前苏联和东欧国家、拉美的教训说明,盲目的"西学东渐"并不能实现行业改革的完善,日本在20世纪80～90年代之间行业管理成效的巨大反差也证明"中学为体,西学为用"的模式也不具有普适性。西方新自由主义学者和政治家转而以治理作为新的理论工具,并以此评判中国行业体制改革的成败,国内也普遍认为实现善治的关键是形成多元共治的局面,而忽视了治理理论的新自由主义实质,所以他们无法解释中国经济发展和行业改革之间的巨大反差,由此可知中国的行业体制改革已经成为一种新的范式。

In the 1970s, with the rise of new liberalism, economic management industrialization has become the wave sweeping the globe. Whether it is a capitalist or socialist country, they all took the path of industry system reform, and the Anglo- American Model is regarded as classic. However, the lesson of East Europe, Soviet Union, and Latin America shows that blind ＂spread of Western culture into the East＂ cannot perfect industry system reform; the enormous contrast of Japan＇ s industrial management effect between1980s and 1990s also proves that the model of ＂Chinese learning is essen- tial and the Western learning is used for reference＂ cannot be commonly used. Western new liberalis- tic scholars and politicians turned to governance as the new theoretical tool, and use it to evaluate the success and the failure of China＇ s industry system reform. Domestic scholars and researchers also gen- erally believed that the key to reach the perfection of the system reform is to form a situation of multi -governing model and neglect the new liberalistic nature of the govemanee theory. Therefore, all of them cannot explain the enormous contrast between China＇s economic development and industrial re- form. This means China＇s industry system reform has become a new paradigm.