期刊文献+

认识的语境论形成的思想根源 被引量:6

The Sources of Epistemic Contextualism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认识的语境论是这样一种观点,即由特定知识语句表达的命题依赖于说出这个句子的语境。具体地讲,认识的语境论主张,由给定的知识语句,如"S知道P","S不知道P",依赖于产生它们的语境,也即,知识的形成与理解是语境依赖的,在某些语境中,S知道P,而在另一个语境中,S不知道P。这两个陈述在各自的语境中都是正确的。语境不同,认识标准的高低程度不同,在不同的语境中进行对话、行动就会产生争论或者冲突;不同的语境设置了不同的认识标准,而且这些认识标准随着语境的变化而变化。认识的语境论是对我们认识判断的最佳解释之一,能够回答怀疑论的问题——为什么在大多数语境中我们能够判断我们拥有知识,而在一些语境中我们不能判断我们拥有知识。这一观点既有不少支持者,同时也受到质疑和批判。 Epistemic or epistemological contextualism is a recent and hotly debated view.To say it formally,epistemic contextualism is such a view that the proposition expressed by a given knowledge sentence depends upon the context in which it is uttered.What makes this view interesting and controversial is that ‘context’ here refers,not to certain features of the putative subject of knowledge,but rather to features of the knowledge attributor’s psychology or conversational-practical situation.As a result of such context-dependence and context-sensitivity,utterances of a given such sentence,or a given proposition,made in different contexts,may differ in truth value.
作者 魏屹东
出处 《社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第10期107-114,共8页 Journal of Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金后期项目(项目批准号:09FZX011) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“语境实在论”(项目批准号:07JJJD20051)的阶段性成果
关键词 认识的语境论 自然主义 格蒂尔问题 多元主义 社会认识论 Epistemic Contextualism Pragmatic Naturalism Gettier Problem Pluralism Social Epistemology
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1Hahn, Lewis E. ,2001," A Contextualistic Worldview : Essay", Southern Illinois University : the Board of Trusteses : 82.
  • 2Pepper, S. , 1942, World Hypotheses : A Study in Evidence, Berkeley, CA : University of California press, p. 232.
  • 3魏屹东.作为世界假设的语境论[J].自然辩证法通讯,2006,28(3):39-45. 被引量:8
  • 4Hahn, Lewis E,2001," A Contextualistic Worldview : Essay", Southern Illinois University : the Board of Trusteses :6 - 7.
  • 5Hahn, Lewis E,2001, "A Contextualistic Worldview : eEssay '" , Southern Illinois University : the Board of Trusteses :84.
  • 6John Dewey, 1931, Context and Thought In University of California Publications in Philosophy, Berkeley University of California Press, 12:203 - 224 ;reprinted in LW 6:5.
  • 7Castaneda, H. , 1980," The Theory of Questions, Epistemic Powers, and the Indexical Theory of Knowledge", Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume V : 217.
  • 8Dretske, F. , 1970," Epistemic Operators", The Journal of Philosophy, 67 ( 24 ) : 1007 - 1023.
  • 9Dretske, F. ,1981, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • 10Dretske, F. ,1981, "The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge" ,Philosophical Studies, 40:363 - 378.

二级参考文献18

  • 1索卡尔 德里达 罗蒂等 蔡仲等译.“索卡尔事件”与科学大战:编者前言[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2002年.第1页.
  • 2Jay A. Labinger and Harry Collins(eds). The One Culture. Chicago and London:The University Press,2001 : 1 -3.
  • 3Macilwain, C. Campuses ring to a stormy clash over truth and reason. Nature387,1997:331 -333.
  • 4Herbert,W. The PC assault on science. U.S. News & World Reportl 18(7):64-66.
  • 5Ward,S. C. Reconfiguring Truth: Postmodernism, Science Studies, and the Search for a New Model of Knowledge.Lanham,MD:Rowman&Littllefield, 1996: ix.
  • 6Matthews, Science Teaching : The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge, 1994: 9.
  • 7Newton- Smith, W.H. The rationality of Science. London: Routedge & Kegan Paul,1981.
  • 8Stove D.C. Popper and After:Four Modern Irrationalists. Elmsford Park, NY:Pergamon, 1982.
  • 9Theocharis, T. & Psimopoulos, M. Where science has gone wrong. Nature392,1987 : 595 - 598.
  • 10Collins, H. & Pinch, T. The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science . Cambridge University Press, 1993.

共引文献14

同被引文献85

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部