摘要
证明妨害严重违背了诚实信用原则和诉讼平等原则,侵害了他人的诉讼利益,应当予以规制。对证明妨害的制裁依据应区分不同的过错形态,分别采取经验法则说和实体法上的义务违反说。对证明妨害的规制措施,不宜单一化,而应由法官进行自由裁量,这样才更具合理性和操作性。
Evidence spoliation seriously violates the honesty,credibility and equality of litigation as well as infringes litigant's interest,so it should be restricted.Sanctions on evidence spoliation should distinguish according to the fault patterns,adopting the theory of empirical rule and the theory of duty violation in the substantive law respectively.Restriction of evidence spoliation shouldn't be simplified.To ensure its rationality and feasibility,the judge's free discretion is inevitable.
出处
《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2010年第5期32-35,共4页
Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
证明妨害
规制方法
经验法则说
义务违反说
自由裁量说
evidence spoliation
restictive method
the theory of empirical rule
the theory of duty violation
discretionary doctrine