动态拨备规则的西班牙经验及其在中国实施的可行性分析被引量：6

Dynamic Provisioning: Spain's Experience and Its Implications for China

导出

摘要文章基于预期损失模型分析了动态贷款损失拨备规则的作用机制,并总结了西班牙实施动态拨备规则的模式和实施效果。研究表明,动态拨备规则能提高银行体系的风险缓冲能力和增强其稳健性,并可作为危机后抑制银行顺周期行为的逆周期资本监管措施的重要补充工具。文章认为我国短期内全面推行动态拨备规则的条件和时机并不具备,但我们应借鉴西班牙动态拨备经验,与《新巴塞尔资本协议》的国内实施时间表相结合,适时改革和推出符合中国国情的银行业前瞻性拨备制度,提高国内银行的风险管理和抵御冲击能力。 Based on the expected loss model,the paper analyzes the mechanism of the dynamic loan loss provisioning and Spain＇s experience.The results show that dynamic provisioning is an effective tool to strengthen banks＇ risk buffer and their stability and could be taken as an important complementary tool of countercyclical capital supervision.It holds that in the short term the conditions and timing of implementing dynamic provisioning in China are not available,but China should learn from Spain＇s experience,combine with the New Basel Capital Accord,and put forward a forward-looking provisioning system to improve domestic banks＇ ability of risk management.

作者徐明东肖宏

机构地区复旦大学金融研究院重庆银监局综合处

出处《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第10期37-47,共11页 Journal of Finance and Economics

基金国家自然科学基金项目(70903013) 教育部人文社科青年基金项目(08JC790022) 上海市晨光计划项目(09CG05)

关键词贷款损失拨备顺周期动态拨备规则 loan loss provisioning procyclicality dynamic provisioning

分类号 F832.33 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1孙天琦,杨岚.有关银行贷款损失准备制度的调查报告——以我国五家上市银行为例的分析[J].金融研究,2005(6):116-130. 被引量：64
2Balla E, McKenna A. Dynamic provisioning: A countercyclical tool for loan loss reserves[R]. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 2009, 95(4):383 -418.
3Bikker J A, Metzemakers P A. Bank provisioning behaviour and procyclicality[J]. International Financial Market, Institutions and Money, 2005, 15:141-157.
4Bouvatier V, Lepetit L. Banks' procyclicality behavior: Does provisioning matter? [R]. Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne Working Paper No. 8174,2006.
5Burroni M, Quagliariello M, Sabatini E, Tola V. Dynamic provisioning: Rationale, functioning,and prudential treatment[R]. Bank of Italy Working Paper No. 57,2009.
6Cavallo M, Majnoni G. Do banks provision for bad loans in good times? Empirical evidence and policy implications [R]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2619,2001.
7Evan Kraft. Dynamic provisioning.- Results of an initial feasibility study for Croatia[R]. Banking Supervisors of Central and Eastern Europe Conference, 2004.
8Jimenez G ,Saurina G. Credit cycles, credit risk, and prudential regulation[J]. International Journal of Central Banking, 2006,2 : 65-98.
9Laeven L, Majnoni G. Loan loss provisioning and economic slow downs: Too much, too late? [ J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2003,12: 178- 197.
10Santiago Ferndndez de Lis, Alicia Garcia Herrero. The housing boom and bust in Spain: Impact of the securitisation model and dynamic provisioning[J]. Housing Finance International, 2008,9 : 14 - 19.