期刊文献+

China's Penetration of the Korean Market:Stylized Facts and Welfare Effect

China's Penetration of the Korean Market:Stylized Facts and Welfare Effect
原文传递
导出
摘要 China's penetration of the world market has been impressive. This paper uses highly disaggregated Korean import data (from 1992 to 2008) to examine China 's penetration of the Korean market in the context of the composition of value (the extensive and intensive margins) and the product type (homogeneous and differentiated) in trade. The increase in Chinese imports has been attributed to the rapid increase in the import of new products (the extensive margin) and of existing products (the intensive margin). However, the growth rate of new products decelerated in the 2000s. The growth in the intensive margin was due to quantity, not price. Chinese imports to Korea did not improve over the period in terms of quality. Although Chinese products became cheaper, they were more differentiated over time. Welfare gains were realized through the expanded introduction of new products from China. However, much of the gains from Korea's Chinese product import boom were realized in earlier years (1992 -2000) because even though imported products became more differentiated, the increase in the extensive margin was lower in more recent years (2001- 2008). China's penetration of the world market has been impressive. This paper uses highly disaggregated Korean import data (from 1992 to 2008) to examine China 's penetration of the Korean market in the context of the composition of value (the extensive and intensive margins) and the product type (homogeneous and differentiated) in trade. The increase in Chinese imports has been attributed to the rapid increase in the import of new products (the extensive margin) and of existing products (the intensive margin). However, the growth rate of new products decelerated in the 2000s. The growth in the intensive margin was due to quantity, not price. Chinese imports to Korea did not improve over the period in terms of quality. Although Chinese products became cheaper, they were more differentiated over time. Welfare gains were realized through the expanded introduction of new products from China. However, much of the gains from Korea's Chinese product import boom were realized in earlier years (1992 -2000) because even though imported products became more differentiated, the increase in the extensive margin was lower in more recent years (2001- 2008).
出处 《China & World Economy》 SCIE 2010年第5期54-71,共18页 中国与世界经济(英文版)
关键词 import penetration elasticity of substitution extensive margin intensive margin WELFARE import penetration, elasticity of substitution, extensive margin, intensive margin, welfare
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Alvarez, Roberto and Sebastian Claro, 2006, "The China phenomenon: Price, quality or variety," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 411, Central Bank of Chile.
  • 2Amiti, Mary and Caroline Freund, 2008, "The anatomy of China's export growth," World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4628, World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • 3Bernard, Andrew, Bradford Jensen, Stephen Redding and Peter Schott, 2009, "The margins of US trade," American Economic Review, Vol. 99, No. 2, pp. 487-93.
  • 4Besedes, Tibor and Thomas Prusa, 2006, "Product differentiation and duration of US import trade," Journal oflnternational Economics, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 339--58.
  • 5Broda, Christian and David Weinstein, 2006, "Globalization and the gains from variety," Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 121, No. 2, pp. 541-85.
  • 6Broda, Christian, Joshua Greenfield, and David Weinstein, 2006, "From groundnuts to globalization: A structural estimate of trade and growth," NBER Working Paper No. 12512, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
  • 7Chaney, Thomas, 2008, "Distorted gravity: The intensive and extensive margins of international trade," American Economic Review, Vol. 98, No. 4, pp. 1707-21.
  • 8Dixit, Avinash and Joshep Stigliz, 1977, "Monopolistic competition and optimum product variety," American Economic Review, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 297-308.
  • 9Erkel-Rousse, Helene and Daniel Mirza, 2002, "Import price elasticities: Reconsidering the evidence," Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 282-306.
  • 10Evans, Carolyn, 2003, "The economics significance of national border effects," American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 1291-312.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部