摘要
历史上经济法与民法之间关于调整对象与地位的争论受到太多的误解,需要重新阐释以发现其历史意义。通过考察特定历史背景,我们发现这次争论的价值不仅促使经济法获得独立法律地位,增进对法学研究的理解;而且有助于经济法学研究转型,在因应经济发展上呈现出三元结构、问题取向、法外论法、结构性研究等有别于传统法学的独特风格。
As there are many misunderstandings in the controversy about the adjusting object and status between economic law and civil law,it is necessary to re-understand it and discover its historic importance.Through the inspection of specific historical perspective,we find that the value of the controversy displays in two aspects.On one hand,it is benefit to understand the legal seience research,and economic law gains independent legal status.On the other hand,it is benefit to economic law reforming,and mang unique styles present in economic development,such as three Yuan structures,problem-solving,the Extra-angle of law,constitutive research,and so on.
出处
《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期80-84,共5页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词
经济法
三元结构
问题取向
法外论法
economic law
three Yuan structures
problem-solving
the Extra-angle of law