期刊文献+

齐拉西酮与利培酮对首发分裂症的疗效及认知功能影响 被引量:3

Control study of Ziprasidone and,Risperidone on Efficacy and Cognitive Function in First-episode Schizophrenia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨齐拉西酮与利培酮对首发分裂症的疗效和安全性,以及对认知功能影响。方法将符合中国精神疾病分类方案与诊断标准第3版(CCMD-3)分裂症诊断标准的86例首发患者随机分为齐拉西酮组(n1=42)和利培酮组(n=44),分别治疗观察’8周。于治疗前和治疗2、4、6、8周末,用阳性症状及阴性症状量表(PANSS)和不良反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和副反应。用韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS—R)、韦氏记忆量表(WMS)和威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)于治疗前后进行认知功能评定。结果两组PANSS总分治疗前后均有显著性差异(P〈0.01),齐拉西酮组有效率92.5%,显效率80%;利培酮组有效率90%,显效率80%,两组疗效无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。治疗6、8周末TESS评分,齐拉西酮组均低于利培酮组,两组有显著性差异(P〈0.01)。两组WAIS—R言语量表、操作量表、全量表和WMS记忆商数及WCST总测验数、持续错误数和随机错误数治疗前后均有显著性差异(P〈0.05或P〈0.01),治疗后两组WMS记忆商数和WCST持续错误数有显著性差异(P〈0.05)。结论齐拉西酮是一种安全有效的非典型抗精神病药物,临床疗效与利培酮相当,并且具有副作用少而轻以及对认知功能的改善明显优于利培酮的特点,可作为治疗精神分裂症的首选药物。 Objective To compare the effect of ziprasidone and risperidone on the efficacy and cogni- tive function in first-episode schizophrenia. Methods 86 first-episode inpatients who met CCMD-3 diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia were randomly divided into study group ( n = 42 ) and control group ( n = 44 ) for an 8- week observation. The study group received ziprasidone, while the control group was treated with risperidone. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale (TESS) were used to evaluate the efficacy and side effects respectively before and after 2, 4, 6, 8 week~ treatment. WAIS-R, WMS, WCST were adopted to evaluate the cognitive function before and after treatment. Results There were significant difference in the total scores of PANSS of the two group after treatment than before ( P 〈 0. 01 ). The effective rate of ziprasidone group was 92. 5% , in which 80% were improved remarkably. The effective rate of risperidone group was 90% , in which 80% were improved remarkably. There were significant difference in curative effect between the two groups( P 〉 0. 05 ). The scores of TESS of study group were significantly lower than those of control group at 6, 8 weekend (P 〈0. 01 ). The scores of WAIS-R language scale, operation scale, to- tal scale, memory quotient(MQ) ,total trials, persistent errors and random errors of W CST were improvedsignificantly in two group compared with before treatment ( P 〈 0. 05 or P 〈 0.01 ). After the treatment, there was remarkable difference on the scores of MQ and persistent errors in study group compared with those in control group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Ziprasidone is a safe and effective atypical antipsychotics, and it 's curative effect is similar to risperidone. However, ziprasidone has few and slight side effects as well as the improvement of the cognitive function of first-episode schizophrenia obviously, it can be used as choice drug for first-episode schizophrenia.
出处 《中国临床实用医学》 2010年第10期95-97,共3页 China Clinical Practical Medicine
关键词 齐拉西酮 利培酮 精神分裂症 认知功能 Ziprasidone Risperidone Schizophrenia Cognitive function
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献49

  • 1修订韦氏成人智力量表全国协作组.韦氏成人智力量表的修订[J].心理学报,1983,15(3):362-370. 被引量:57
  • 2汪春运.齐哌西酮的精神科应用[J].国外医学(精神病学分册),2005,32(1):40-43. 被引量:90
  • 3童建明,杨正春.几种新型抗精神病药介绍[J].临床精神医学杂志,2005,15(3):182-182. 被引量:147
  • 4方永璋.慢性精神分裂症的智力测验[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1984,10(2):82-82.
  • 5[1]Goldman R, Lidow MS, Gallager DW. Overlap of dopaminergic, adrenergic and serotoninergic receptors and complementarity of their subtypes in primate prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci, 1990, 10(2) :2125
  • 6[2]Kahn R, Harvery P, Davidson M. Neuropsychological correlates of central monoamine function to chronic schizophrenia: Relationship between CSF metabolits and cognitive function. Schizophrenia Res, 1994, 11(5):217
  • 7[3]Berman KF, Weinberger DR. Functional location in the brain in schizophrenia. America Psychiatry Press. Review of Psychiatry, 1991, 10(1):24
  • 8[4]Gold J, Larpenter C, Kandoph C. Auditory working memory and WCST performance in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1987, 54(1):159
  • 9[5]Okubo Y, Suhara T. Decreased prefrontal dopamine D1 receptors in schizophrenia revealed by PET. Nature, 1997, 385(4):634
  • 10[6]Didrisksen MO. Effects of antipsychotics on cognitive behavior in rats using the delayed nonmatch to position paradigm. Eur J Pharmacol, 1995,281(4) :241

共引文献386

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部