期刊文献+

刑事诉讼庭前准备程序的反思与重构 被引量:2

Introspection and Re-establishment of Procedure of Pre-trial Preparation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 庭前准备程序为审判活动的公正、高效进行提供了重要的保证。通过庭前准备程序,控辩双方的诉讼参与权得以实现,案件争议焦点得以明确,非法证据被排除在法庭之外。目前我国的刑事诉讼庭前准备程序存在诸多不足,如权利告知和整理争点的功能欠缺,证据开示的规则并不完善,控辩双方参与庭前准备的作用被弱化。为了实现公正审判等诉讼理念,应当对我国的庭前准备程序进行重构,以发挥其对审判活动的重要作用。 Procedure of pre-trial preparation provides a significant assurance for the justice and efficiency of the trial.The procedure of pre-trial preparation is a procedure in which the prosecution and the defendant can show their evidences,find out and assemble their disagreements under the judge's control,and in which the judge can review the qualification of the evidence,and decide to preserve the relevant evidence.According to these preparatory activities,both the public prosecutors and the accused can exercise their rights of participation in criminal proceedings effectively,and disagreements of the two parties about the case will be clear,and illegal evidence will be excluded before the court session opens.There are deficiencies in current criminal pre-trial procedure of China.The functions of informing of the procedural rights and assembling the disagreements don't work well,and the rules of evidence display still have a series of defects.While the work prepared for the re-amendment of the criminal procedure law has been already accomplished in the purpose of achieving procedural values such as justifiable trial,it is right the time to re-establish the pre-trial procedure of China.Only in this way,can the procedure of pre-trial preparation deeply affect and greatly accelerate the court session.
作者 李玉华 李森
出处 《河北科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第3期36-40,87,共6页 Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
关键词 《刑事诉讼法》 庭前准备程序 证据开示 整理争点 证据保全 重构 code of criminal procedure procedure of pre-trial preparation evidence display assemblage of disagreements preserve the relevant evidence re-establishment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[日] 田口守一.刑事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2000.
  • 2[日] 松尾浩也.日本刑事诉讼法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
  • 3[美] 约书亚·德雷斯勒,艾伦.C.迈克尔斯.美国刑事诉讼法精解(第二卷:刑事审判)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009.
  • 4宋英辉,陈永生.刑事案件庭前审查及准备程序研究[J].政法论坛,2002,20(2):65-75. 被引量:38

二级参考文献7

  • 1中国政法大学刑事法律研究中心.《英国刑事诉讼制度的新发展-赴英考察报告》.陈光中,江伟主编.《诉讼法论丛》(第2卷),法律出版社,1998年版,第327页.
  • 2Pual F. Rothstein, Evidence, State and Federal Rule, West Pub. Co. ,1981, P.99.
  • 3Peter Murphy,Murphy on Evidence,P.224.
  • 4铃木茂嗣.《刑事证据法的若干问题》.中国法律出版社/日本国成文堂,1997年版.第170页.
  • 5黄东熊.《证据法纲要》.台湾五南图书出版公司,1984年版,第101-102页.
  • 6[日]石川才显.通说刑事诉讼法[M].三省堂,1992.
  • 7中国政法大学刑事法律研究中心.德国刑事司法程序的若干问题-访德考察报告[R].

共引文献38

同被引文献9

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部