1Esquenazi S, Bui V,Grunstein L, et alo Safety and stability of la- ser in situ keratomileusis for myopic correction performed under thin flaps. Can J Ophthalmol ,2007, 42:592 -599.
2Caster AI , Friess DW , Potvin RJ. Absence of kerateetasia after LASIK in eyes with preoperative central corneal thickness of 450 to 500 microns. J refract surg, 2007 ,23:782-788.
3Bourla N. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of sur- face ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a mi- crokeratome or femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2008, 34:2049 - 2056.
4Carpel EF, Carlson KH, Shannon S. Folds and striae in laser insi- tu keratomileusis flaps. J Refract Surg, 1999, 15:687 -690.
5Cobo-Soriano R, Calvo MA, Beltran J,et al. Thin flap laser in si tu keratomileusis : analysis of contrast sensitivity, visual, and re- fractive outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg , 2005, 31:1357 - 1365.
6Nilforoushan MR, Speaker M, Marmor M, et al. Comparative e- valuation of refractive surgery candidates with Placido topography, Orbscan II, Pentacam, and wavefront analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2008 ,34:623 - 631.
7Chan CC ,Boxer Wachler BS. Comparison of the effects of LASIK retreatment techniques on epithelial ingrowth rates. Ophthalmology ,2007, 114:640 -642.
8Brilakis HS, Holland EJ. Anterior stromal puncture in the treat- ment of loose epithelium after LASIK. J Refract Surg, 2006,22: 103 - 105.
9Patel S, Alio JL, Javaloy J, et al. Human cornea before and after refractive surgery using a new device: VCH - 1. Cornea, 2008, 27 : 1042 - 1049.
