期刊文献+

交互式模糊稳健优化设计及其应用 被引量:2

Interactive fuzzy robust optimization design and its application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 产品质量与设计变量容差间的冲突性和模糊关联性往往导致稳健优化结果与设计者意图有所偏差.针对这类问题,在考虑工程稳健设计中存在主、客观不确定因素的前提下,利用区间加权系数构造模糊稳健优化设计的容差模型,采用物理规划表达设计者的局部偏好,控制区间权值产生候选Pareto解集,利用折中规划建立Pareto解到评分值的映射,并据此改进设计偏好,从而实现稳健优化过程的交互式决策.实例证明,所提方法获得了兼顾主、客观设计要求不确定性的最满意解. The conflictive and fuzzy coupling relationships between product quality and tolerances of design variables always bring out the deviation between optimization results and design intention to a certain extent.Considering the fuzzy subjective and objective factors,which exist in engineering robust design problem,a fuzzy robust optimization model based on tolerance objectives is established using interval weighted coefficient method.Physical programming is used to describe the designers' progressive preference.A Pareto design set is obtained by controlling the interval weighted coefficients.A map from Pareto designs to their corresponding evaluation value is established using compromise programming.An interactive decision-making is carried out through improving the progressive preference by the tradeoff of the conflictive degree between objectives.The given numerical example illustrates that the proposed method can get the optimal solution which satisfies the subjective and objective uncertainties of robust design requirements.
出处 《大连理工大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第5期672-676,共5页 Journal of Dalian University of Technology
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目(NCET-05-0285)
关键词 模糊稳健优化设计 容差 交互式决策 物理规划 fuzzy robust optimal design tolerance interactive decision-making physical programming
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献40

  • 1陈立周,翁海珊,任婷婷.基于随机模型的产品质量设计原理与方法[J].工程设计学报,1995,2(4):12-16. 被引量:5
  • 2程立周.工程随机变量优化设计方法--原理与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,1997..
  • 3[1]Deb K.Multiobjective genetic algorithms: Problem difficulties and construction of test functions[J].Evolutionary Computation,1999,7(3):205-230.
  • 4[2]Jared L Cohon,David H Marks.A review and evaluation of multiobjective programming techniques[J].Water Resources Research,1975,11(2):208-220.
  • 5[3]Loucks D P.Conflict and choice:Planning for multiple objectives[A].Blitzer C,Clark P and Taylor L.Economy wide Models and Development Planning[C].New York Oxford University Press:1975.
  • 6[4]Peter C Fishburn.A survey of multiattribute/multicriterion evaluation theories[A].Zionts S.Multiple Criteria Problem Solving[C],Berlin Springer-Verlag:1978.181-224.
  • 7[5]Carlos M Fonseca,Peter J Fleming.An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization[J].Evolutionary Computation,1995,3(1):1-16.
  • 8[6]Jeffrey Horn.Multicriterion Decision making[A].Tho-mas Bck,David Fogel,and Zbigniew Michalewicz.Handbook of Evolutionary Computation.volume 1[C],New York IOP Publishing Ltd.and Oxford University Press:1997.F1.9:1-F1.9:15.
  • 9[7]Van Veldhuizen David A,Gary B Lamont.Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: analyzing the state-of-the-art[J].Evolutionary Computation,2000,8(2):1-26.
  • 10[8]Carlos A Coello Coello.A comprehensive survey of evolutionary-based multiobjective optimization techniques[J].Knowledge and Information Systems,1999,1(3):269-308.

共引文献53

同被引文献71

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部