期刊文献+

针刺“盛氏咽四穴”对声带息肉术后声带功能恢复的影响 被引量:6

Effects on function rehabilitation of vocal cord after vocal cord polyps surgery treated with acupuncture at Sheng's Four Points of Throat
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察针刺"盛氏咽四穴"在声带息肉术后声带功能恢复中的作用。方法:60例声带息肉术后患者随机分为咽四穴+药物治疗组(30例)及药物治疗组(30例)。咽四穴+药物组针刺"咽四穴"及配合药物治疗,药物治疗组仅进行药物治疗,观察治疗前后两组患者症状体征积分及嗓音分析情况。结果:术后第4天,咽四穴+药物治疗组症状体征积分与药物治疗组比较明显改善(P<0.05),嗓音分析情况均好于药物治疗组(均P<0.05),咽四穴+药物治疗组总有效率为83.3%(25/30),高于药物治疗组的60.0%(18/30,P<0.05)。结论:针刺"盛氏咽四穴"配合药物治疗对声带息肉术后患者的声带功能恢复具有促进作用,疗效优于单纯药物治疗。 Objective To observe the effects on function rehabilitation of vocal cord after vocal cord polyps surgery treated with acupuncture at Sheng's Four Points of Throat. Methods Sixty cases were randomly divided into a combined therapy group of Four Points of Throat and medication (group 1,30 cases) and a medication group (group 2,30 cases). In group 1 Four Points of Throat were punctured and routine medication was applied; in group 2, only routine medication was applied. The scores of symptom-sign and status of voice were observed and analyzed before and after treatment in two groups. Results At 4th day after the surgery, the improvement of the symptomsign scores in group 1 was more significant than that in group 2 (P〈0.05) ; and the voice analysis status in group 1 was superior to that in group 2 (all P〈0.05). The total effective rate was 83.3% (25/30) in group 1, which was superior to that of 60.0% (18/30) in group 2 (P〈0.05). Conclusion The effect on function rehabilitation of vocal cord after vocal cord polyps surgery treated with the combined therapy group of Four Points of Throat and routine medication is favorable, superior to that with routine medication therapy.
出处 《中国针灸》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第10期822-825,共4页 Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
关键词 声带息肉 针刺疗法 盛氏咽四穴 Vocal Cord Polyps Acupuncture Therapy Sheng's Four Points of Throat
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献25

  • 1黄昭鸣 王政敏.噪音和言语病理学的基础及临床应用.耳鼻喉科学的新理论和新技术[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1997.155-166.
  • 2De Bodt M, Wuyts F, Van de Heyning P, et al. Test - retest study of the GRBAS scale : influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality[J]. J Voice, 1997, 11: 74.
  • 3Dejonckere PH, Obbens C, De Moor GM, et al. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia : Reliability and relevance[J]. Folia Phoniatrica, 1993,45: 76.
  • 4Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Van de heyning PH. Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia[J]. J Voice,1999, 13: 508.
  • 5Wolfe V, Fitch J, Martin D. Acoustic measures of dysphonic severity across and within voice types[J]. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 1997, 49:292.
  • 6Piccirillo J, Colin P, Dennis F. Assessment of two objective voice function indices[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1998, 107: 396.
  • 7Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Molenberghs G, et al. The dysphonia severity index : an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approch[J]. J Speech Hear Res, 2000, 43: 796.
  • 8Eskenazi L, Childers DG, Hicks DM. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality[J]. J Speech Hear Res, 1991, 33: 298.
  • 9Yu P, Ouaknine M, Giovanni A. Intérêt clinique du calcul des coefficients de Lyapunov pour l' analyse objective des dysphonies[J]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2000, 5: 301.
  • 10Hirano M. Psycho - acoustic evaluation of voice : GRBAS Scale for evaluating the hoarse voice. Clinical examination of voice[J]. Springer Verlag, Wien, 1981.

共引文献111

同被引文献69

引证文献6

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部