期刊文献+

寰枢椎后路“三点式”经椎弓根固定的生物力学评价 被引量:5

The biomechanical evaluation of atlantoaxial instrumentation by three-point pedicle screw technique
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价寰枢椎后路椎弓根钉棒系统"三点式"固定方法的生物力学稳定性。方法:采用6具新鲜人体颈椎标本制作6种状态,分别为正常组(A组)及失稳后固定组,用磨钻切除寰椎前弓约1.5cm,用摆锯于基底部切断齿状突,切断寰枢间所有韧带,切开寰枢侧块关节囊后半部分制成寰枢椎失稳的模型,再根据不同的固定方式将失稳后固定组分为Brooks钢丝固定组(B组)、左侧C1~C2椎弓根螺钉固定组(C组)、C1双侧椎弓根螺钉+C2左侧椎弓根螺钉棒固定组("三点式"固定,D组),C1左侧椎弓根螺钉+C2双侧椎弓根螺钉棒固定组("三点式"固定,E组)、双侧C1~C2椎弓根螺钉棒固定组(F组)。在脊柱三维运动仪上依次测量6种状态下寰枢椎间的屈伸、侧屈、旋转运动范围并利用统计学方法评价其稳定性。结果:在各个运动方向上,各种内固定组的运动范围均小于正常组(P<0.05),D、E组间无差异(P>0.05);在屈伸、左/右旋转、右侧屈时,D、E组的稳定性与F组间无差异(P>0.05),均优于B组及C组(P<0.05);在左侧屈时,D、E组的稳定性不如F组(P<0.05),但优于C组及B组(P<0.05)。结论:"三点式"固定具有可靠的三维稳定性,能够满足寰枢椎不稳临床治疗的要求。 Objective:To evaluate the biomechanical stability of three-point pedicle screw technique for at-lantoaxial instrumentation.Method:Six fresh human cadaveric cervical spines(C0-C5)(age,25-36 years) were used.After testing the intact spines (group A),instability was induced by removing the anterior arch of atlas, transverse and alar ligaments and posterior capsule of atlantoxial joints.Then the instable spines were subject-ed to the following five different techniques,Brook wire fixation technique (group B),C1-C2 left pedicle screws fixation (group C),C1 bilateral pedicle screws and C2 left pedicle screw fixation (group D),C1 left pedicle screw and C2 bilateral pedicle screws fixation(group E),C1-C2 bilateral pedicle screws fixation(group F).Range of motion at C1-C2 was measured at each specimen on six loading directions through spinal flexi-ble motion testing system.The data were analyzed using SPSS software.Result:All 5 techniques significantly decreased range of motion of C1-C2 compared with the intact spine (P0.05).There was no statistical differ-ence between group D and group E(P0.05).There was no statistical difference among group D,E,F(P0.05) in flexion/extension,axial rotation and right lateral bending,however they showed superior to group B and C (P0.05).As for left lateral bending,group D or E demonstrated a trend toward increasing range of motion compared with group F (P0.05),but still superior to group B and C (P0.05).Conclusion:Fixation of at-lantoaxial complex using three-point pedicle screw technique can provide reliable stability,which can be used in clinical practice.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第10期860-863,共4页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 内固定 生物力学 寰枢椎失稳 椎弓根镙钉 Internal fixation Biomechanics Atlas Pedicle scew
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1马向阳,尹庆水,夏虹,吴增晖,钟世镇,刘景发,徐达传.枢椎后路侧块螺钉固定的解剖研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2004,14(7):417-420. 被引量:9
  • 2马向阳,尹庆水,刘景发,吴增晖,夏虹,昌耘冰,章凯,麦小红.C_(2/3)经关节螺钉固定的临床应用解剖研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(8):595-597. 被引量:9
  • 3马向阳,尹庆水,吴增晖,夏虹,刘景发,麦小红.枢椎椎板螺钉固定的解剖可行性研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(1):48-51. 被引量:37
  • 4Grob D,Jeanneret B,Aebi M,et al. Atlanto-axial fusion with transarticular screw fixation[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1991,73(6) :972-976.
  • 5Goel A, Desai KI, Muzumdar DP. Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method:a report of 160 treated patients[J].Neurosurg,2002,51 (6): 1351-1357.
  • 6Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation[J].Spine.2001,26(22):2467-2471.
  • 7Resnick DK, Benzel EC. C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation with rigid cantilever beam construct:case report and technical note [J].Neurosurg,2002,50(2) :426-428.
  • 8Richter M,Schmidt R,Claes L,et al. Posterior atlantoaxial fixation biomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques[J].Spine, 2602,27 ( 16 ): 1724-1732.
  • 9Melcher RP,Puttlitz CM,Kleinstueck FS,et al. Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques [J].Spine,2002,27(22) :2435-2440.
  • 10Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation[J]. Spine,2001,26(22):2461-2471.

共引文献409

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部