摘要
目的:3种梅毒检测方法比较,选择适合特殊人群梅毒感染状况的筛查方法。方法:采用ELISA法进行抗体检测,并与TRUST方法检测结果进行比较,阳性样本再用TPPA法进行确证。结果:经TPPA确认阳性的282件样本中,ELISA方法检出281件阳性,检出率为99.6%,TRUST方法检出194件阳性,检出率为68.8%,差异具显著统计学意义;ELISA方法检测样本OD值的高低与TPPA符合率有着显著差异,与TRUST符合率也有显著差异。结论:ELISA法能满足特殊人群梅毒感染状况筛查,但对OD值较低的阳性样本应再以TPPA确认。
Objective:To compare three methods of syphilis screening test,and find the most suitable one.Methods: Test serum of the samples with ELISA and TRUST,and compare the results.The positive samples are confirmed by TPPA again.Results: According to TPPA,282 samples are positive;With ELISA,the positive number is 281,and the positive rate is 99.6%.However,following TRUST,the positive samples are 194,and the rate is 68.8%.There are statistically significant difference.Compared with TPPA andTRUST,the OD values also varies in ELISA.Conclusion: ELISA is suitable for syphilis screening test in special populations.But TPPA should be used to confirm the positive samples with lower OD.
出处
《中国卫生检验杂志》
CAS
2010年第10期2501-2502,共2页
Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词
梅毒
特殊人群
检测方法
Syphilis
Special populations
Detection methods