期刊文献+

中国本位文化论争与“现代化”共识的形成 被引量:1

Chinese Standard Culture Debate and the Formation of "Modernization" Consensus
原文传递
导出
摘要 1930年代的中国本位文化派与全盘西化派论战过程中,双方既不断批评对方的主张,更加清晰地阐明自己的意见,又不断吸收对方观点的合理之处,调整和修正自己的看法。西化派认识到"现代化不等于西化",开始从主张"全盘西化"转向"现代化";中国本位文化派则表示自己并不主张复古守旧,进而认同西化和"现代化"。这样,双方的观点越来越明朗化,渐渐形成了关于"现代化"问题的共识。人们逐渐用"现代化"来代替"西化";"全盘西化"论在中国思想文化界的影响力逐渐减弱,中西文化真正进入了沟通融合以创造中国现代新文化的新阶段。 In the process of the controversy between Chinese culture school and Westernized school in 1930s,both sides not only criticized the views of the other side and clarified their own views more clearly,but also absorbed the reasonable ideas of the other side continuously and adjusted and revised their own views.The Westernized school recognized "modernization does not mean Westernization" ,and began to substitute "modernization" for "total Westernization" ;the Chinese standard culture school insisted they did not advocate retro and old fashion,thus identified with Westernization and "modernization".In this way,views of both sides became more and more clear,and gradually formed consensus on "modernization".There is a growing use of "modernization" instead of "total Westernization" ;the influence of "total Westernization" gradually decreased in China's ideological and cultural fields;Chinese and Western cultures truly entered a new stage of creating Chinese modern new culture through communication and fusion.
作者 左玉河
出处 《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期139-144,共6页 Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
关键词 本位文化 现代化 西化 standard culture modernization Westernization
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1陈序经.《关于全盘西化答吴景超先生》[J].独立评论,1935,142.
  • 2严既澄.《<我们的总答复>书后》[N].《大公报》,1935年5月23日.
  • 3熊梦飞.谈“中国本位文化建设”之闲天[J].文化建设,1935,(9).
  • 4张熙若.《全盘西化与中国本位》[J].国闻周报,1935,:9-9.
  • 5胡适.《再论信心与反省》[J].独立评论,1934,105.
  • 6刘絮敖.《中国本位意识与中国本位文化》[J].文化建设,1935,1(9).

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部