期刊文献+

一种军事通信网络效能评估专家意见融合方法 被引量:1

A Method for Experts' Opinion Combination of Military Communication Networks Effectiveness Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决军事通信网络效能评估中专家评估冲突意见的融合问题,提出了一种新的融合方法。新方法首先利用多属性群决策层次评估方法对专家的评估意见进行量化处理,得到针对某一指标的专家评判意见的信任度函数。然后利用改进的证据理论合成规则对专家评判意见的信任度函数进行融合。最后,通过算例对文中的方法进行了验证。与利用经典的合成规则融合专家评估意见相比,新方法有效的解决了高冲突意见融合中存在的"一票否决"等现象,并且具有更好的鲁棒性。新方法应用于军事通信网络效能评估中专家评估意见融合时,可以客观地反映专家的评估意见。 A new combination method is introduced for solving the combination problem of experts'conflict opinions of military communication network effectiveness evaluation in this paper. For the new method, firstly, the quantification of evaluation opinions of experts is made based on multi - attribute group decision - making level evaluation model, then the basic probability distribute functions of each index are calculated based on the experts" evaluation opinions. Secondly, the basic probability distribute functions are combined based on the improved D - S model. Finally, a case is analyzed. The results show that the problem such as rejecting by one condition is solved and the new method is more reliable compared to the classic combination rule of D -S model. The opinions of experts can be reflected objectively and impersonally when the new method is used in combining the experts'opinions in the evaluation of military communication networks effectiveness.
出处 《空军工程大学学报(自然科学版)》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第5期65-69,共5页 Journal of Air Force Engineering University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划资助项目(2009JM8001-1)
关键词 军事通信网络 效能 评估意见 融合方法 military communication network effectiveness evaluation opinion combination method
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献83

共引文献598

同被引文献16

  • 1吕文红,吴祈宗,郭银景.基于D-S证据理论的群决策专家意见集结方法[J].运筹与管理,2005,14(2):10-13. 被引量:14
  • 2Beynon M J. A method of aggregation in DS/AHP for group decision - making with the non - equivalent importance of individuals in the group[ J ]. Computers & operations research, 2005, 32(7) :1881 -1896.
  • 3Yang J B, Wang Y M. The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties[ J]. European journal of operational research, 2006, 171 : 309 -343.
  • 4SMETS P, KENNES R. The transferable belief model [ J ]. Artificial intelligence, 1994, 66 (3) : 191 - 243.
  • 5Yager R R. On the Dempster -Shafer approach to diagnosing hierarchical hypotheses L J/. Communication of ACM, 1989, 32 (5) :573 -585.
  • 6Smarandache F, Dezert J. Advances and applications of DSmT for information fusion (collected works) [ EB/OL]. (2006 - 12 - 14 ) [ 2011 - 1 - 1 ]. http ://www. gallup, unm. edu/N smarandache/DSmT - book2, pdf.
  • 7Murphy C K. Combining of belief functions when evidence conflicts [ J ]. Decision support systems, 2000, 29 : 1 - 9.
  • 8DENG Y, Shi W K, Zhu Z F, et al. Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence [ J ]. Decision support systems, 2004, 38:489 - 493.
  • 9Jousselme A L,Grenier D, Bosse E. A new distance between two bodies of evidence [J]. Information fusion, 2001,2( 1 ) :91 -101.
  • 10Sudano John J. Pign i st ic probability transforms for mixes of low and high probability events [ C ]//The 4th international conference of information iusion 2001. Montreal:[ s. n. ] ,2001:1 -7.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部