期刊文献+

学习者英语演讲主位结构与演讲水平关系研究 被引量:1

An Investigation into the Relationship between Thematic Structure in Learner English Speeches and Their Speaking Levels
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用定量测量方法,对比分析学习者不同水平英语演讲语篇在主位类型和主位推进模式选择方面所体现的特征。从整体来看,不同水平演讲者在主位结构选择上呈现相似特征;统计分析发现,低水平演讲者与高水平演讲者相比,更多选择复项主位(主要是其语篇主位)以及集中型和并列型两种推进模式来构建语篇,使其语篇显得不够正式且单调乏味,影响其语篇整体质量。 By adopting of quantitative analysis,a comparative analysis is conducted to investigate the features of thematic choices and thematic progression patterns manifested in advanced-level and lower-level learner English speeches.On the whole,the two groups of speakers show similar features in thematic structure,but further statistical analysis indicates that lower-level speakers tend to employ more multiple Themes(mainly textual ones)and more concentrated and parallel thematic progression patterns than their advanced-level counterparts,which damages the formality and liveliness,and hence the overall quality of their speeches.
作者 于琴妹
出处 《江苏技术师范学院学报》 2010年第8期28-32,共5页 Journal of Jiangsu Teachers University of Technology
基金 江苏技术师范学院青年科研基金项目"中国学习者英语公众演讲主位结构研究"(项目编号:KYY09055)
关键词 主位 主位推进模式 英语演讲 演讲水平 theme thematic progression pattern English speeches speaking level
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献29

  • 1徐海铭,潘海燕.元语篇的理论和实证研究综述[J].外国语,2005,28(6):54-61. 被引量:41
  • 2Austin, J. 1962. How to Do Things with Words [M], Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.
  • 3Bechtold, B., & R, Johnson, 1989. Statistics for Business and Economics [ M ]. Boston : PWSKent Publishing Company.
  • 4Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad & E. Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English [ M ]. London : Pearson Education Limited.
  • 5Chafe, W. 1986. Evidentiaity in English conversation and academic writing IA]. In Chafe & Nicholas (eds,). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [C]. Norwood, NJ : Ablex.
  • 6Cheng, B. 2000. Philosophical Studies of Logic [M]. Beijing: The Press of the People's University of China.
  • 7Cheng, X. G. & M. S. Steffensen. 1996. Metadiscourse: A technique for improving studentwriting [J]. Research in the Teaching of English Vol. 30 (2): 149-181.
  • 8Conley, T. M. 1983. Interpersonal Communication [M]. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
  • 9Connor, U., & J. Laurer. 1985. Understanding persuasive essay writing: Linguistic /rhetoric approach [J]. Text 5 (4): 309-326.
  • 10Crismore, A. 1990. Meta-discourse and Discourse Processes: Interaction and Issues [J]. Discourse Processes 13: 191-205.

同被引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部