期刊文献+

知识密集型服务企业与制造企业互动创新绩效影响因素的实证研究 被引量:8

Empirical Study on Influencement Factors of Interaction Innovation Performance between KIBS and Manufacturing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 知识密集型服务企业作为知识的生产者和传播者,通过与制造企业进行知识转移和互动,促进了制造业的创新。本文从互动强度和互动时间两个维度,提出知识密集型服务企业与制造企业互动创新的3类界面——销售式界面、咨询式界面和联盟式界面,剖析了三类界面中的知识转移分析框架,提炼出7个影响互动创新绩效的主要因素,进而分析了不同界面下这些因素对互动创新绩效影响的机制,并通过实证研究对影响机理进行了验证。 As producer and spreader of professional knowledge,knowledge intensive business service(KIBS) helps manufacturing enterprises to innovate by interacting and changing konwledge with them.This paper uses two dimensions,namely the intensity of interaction and the time of interaction,to clarify the classification of interaction interface between KIBS and manufacturing enterprises.According to the above-mentioned classification,this paper refines seven factors which have important impacts on the performance of cooperative innovation,and then analyzes how these factors influence the performance through knowledge transfer under different interfaces.Finally,it studies empirically the importance of knowledge transfer and the factors influencing the interaction performance.
出处 《技术经济》 2010年第10期12-18,共7页 Journal of Technology Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70373026) 浙江省科技规划重点项目(2005C25002) 浙江省自然科学基金项目(Y605358)
关键词 知识密集型服务企业 制造企业 互动 创新绩效 knowledge intensive business service(KIBS) manufacturing enterprise interaction innovation performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1罗炜,唐元虎.企业合作创新的原因与动机[J].科学学研究,2001,19(3):91-95. 被引量:37
  • 2MULLER E,ZENKER A.Business services as actors of knowledge transformation the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems[J].Research Policy,2001(30):1501-1516.
  • 3李正风.中国科技系统中的“系统失效”及其解决初探[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1999,14(4):19-24. 被引量:19
  • 4ARGOTE L,INGRAM P.Knowledge transfer:a basis for competitive advantage in firms[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2000,82(1):150-169.
  • 5SUHK Y,RYEOL Y.A framework of knowledge transfer in cross-border joint ventures:an empirical test of the Korean context[J].Management International Review (MIR),2004,44(4):417-434.
  • 6ZANDER U,KOGUT B.Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities:An empirical test[J].Organization Science,1995,6(1):76-92.
  • 7SZULANSKI G.Exploring internal stickiness:impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(Summer special issue):27-43.
  • 8SZULANSKI G.The process of knowledge transfer:a diachronic analysis of stickiness[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2000,82(1):9-27.
  • 9TIMBRELL T,ANDREVIRA M,GABLE G.Impediments to inter-firm transfer of best practice in an enterprise systems context[Z].Proceedings of the Seventh Americas Conference on Information Systems,Boston,2001.
  • 10CUMMINGS L.Knowledge Transfer across R&D Units:An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Successful Knowledge Transfer across Infra-and Inter-organizational Units[M].Washington:The George Washington University,2002.

二级参考文献25

  • 1郭晓川.企业网络合作化技术创新及其模式比较[J].科学管理研究,1998,16(5):16-20. 被引量:18
  • 2[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 3[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 4[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 5[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 6[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 7[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 8[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 9[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64
  • 10[11]Clogg C C, Petkova E, Shihadeh E S. Statistical methods for analyzing collapsibility in regression models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992, 17(1): 51~74

共引文献7274

同被引文献180

引证文献8

二级引证文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部