期刊文献+

学术论文文献综述论证语类的建构模式及其应用示例 被引量:4

A Shaping Model for Writing Argumentative Literature Reviews and Its Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文提出学术论文文献综述属论证语类,整合出其建构模式,通过示例说明其适用性。该模式揭示研究者不仅需要站在论证方的立场总结归纳现有研究的成果,还要从对立面质疑、评析现有研究,从而发现争议点。研究者在经历论证与辩驳交互进行的论辩过程之后才确立研究焦点。该建构模式有助于在操作层面解决研究焦点该如何确立这一长期困扰论文撰写者的问题。 This paper argues for literature review as argumentation genre and formulates a shaping model for writing argumentative literature reviews. Its applicability is exemplified by Chilton's review entry of Critical Discourse Analysis for the Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences (Hogan 2010). The present model reveals that a review writer is expected to take not only the Stance of a protagonist to summarize, classify, and compare relevant existent literature on a topic, but that of an antagonist to question, and critique what have been done in an attempt to establish a gap, and shape research focus or research questions for a current study. This model enables thesis writers to find their research focus.
作者 钟虹
出处 《广东外语外贸大学学报》 2010年第5期30-33,共4页 Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目基金资助 项目名称:<当代中国社会变迁与话语建构> 批准号:2009JJD740006 广东省"211工程"三期建设项目<全球化背景下的外国语言文学研究>子课题<在外语教学中培养大学生批评性思维能力的研究>(项目编号:GDUFS211-1-055)的阶段性研究成果 广东外语外贸大学英语教育中心研究项目(编号399-X3508006)的阶段性成果 广东外语外贸大学教研重点项目<通过培养写作精品意识来全面提高大学生英语水平>的研究成果之一
关键词 学术论文 文献综述 论证语类 建构模式 academic writing literature review argumentation genre shaping model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Dudley-Evans, A. Genre analysis: An investigation of the introductions and discourse sections of MSc dissertations[A]. In Coulthard, M. (ed.). Talking about Text[C]. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. 1986.
  • 2Swales, John M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research settings[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1990.
  • 3Bunton, D. Generic stages in Ph.D. thesis introductions[A]. In Flowerdew, J. (ed.). Academic Discourse[C]. London: Longman. 2002.
  • 4Shawl, E Science research students' composing processes[J]. English for Specific Purpose. 1991(10): 189-206.
  • 5Cooley, L. Lewkowicz, J. The writing needs of graduate students at the University of Hong Kong: A project report[J]. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching. 1995 (18): 121-123.
  • 6Meloy, J. M. Writing the Qualitative Dissertation: Understanding by Doing (2^nd eda.)[M]. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2002.
  • 7Swales, J. M. & Lindemann, S. Teaching the literature review to international graduate students[A]. In Johns, A. M. (ed.). Genre in the Classroom[C]. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2002.
  • 8Miller, C. R. Genre as Social Action[J]. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1984(2): 151-167.
  • 9Tardy, C. M. & Swales, J. M.. Form, text organization, genre, coherence, and cohesion[A]. In Bazerman, C. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Writing[C]. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum. 2008.
  • 10van Eemcren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004.

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部