期刊文献+

应用^(18)FDGPET评价食管癌新辅助治疗疗效的价值 被引量:4

The evaluation of response to neoadjuvant therapy using ^(18)FDG PET in esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景与目的:食管癌患者采用新辅助治疗有望提高其预后,因此新辅助治疗的疗效评价非常关键。目前,18FDGPET被认为是评价食管癌新辅助治疗疗效最佳的检查方法。本研究采用Meta分析方法系统评价18FDGPET对食管癌新辅助治疗疗效的诊断价值。方法:通过MEDLINE及EMBASE数据库检索、收集公开发表的应用18FDGPET评价食管癌新辅助治疗疗效的所有英文文献。对收集到的文献参照QUADAS系统进行质量评估。对符合标准的入选文献数据进行统计处理,计算综合敏感度、特异度及诊断优势比;根据Moses’线性模型绘制SROC曲线,计算曲线下面积及Q*值。结果:入选的13篇文献均满足QUADAS质量评价系统所列评估项目。18FDGPET评价食管癌新辅助治疗疗效的综合敏感度为70.3%(95%CI:64.4%~75.8%),综合特异度为70.1%(95%CI:65.1%~74.8%),综合诊断优势比为9.389(95%CI:3.482~25.319);SROC曲线下面积为0.8244,Q*值为0.7575。结论:18FDGPET作为一种无创性分子影像诊断技术,在评价食管癌患者接受新辅助治疗疗效上具有较高的诊断价值。 Background and purpose:Neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer is introduced in an effort to improve prognosis.Response assessment is crucial for the treatment of these patients.Currently,FDG-PET seems to be the best available tool for neoadjuvant therapy response assessment in esophageal cancer.The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of 18FDG PET for the evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy response in esophageal cancer with a meta-analysis.Methods:All the studies published in the English language for 18FDG PET assessing neoadjuvant therapy response in esophageal cancer in MEDLINE and EMBASE database were collected.Methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the QUADAS quality assessment tool.Pooled sensitivity,specifi city,diagnostic odds ratio and SROC (summary receiver operating characteristic curves) were obtained using statistical software.Results:Thirteen studies included in the meta-analysis fulfilled the inclusion criteria listed in the QUADAS quality assessment requirements.The pooled sensitivity,specifi city and diagnostic odds ratio for 18FDG PET in the evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy response in esophageal cancer were 70.3% (95%CI:64.4%-75.8%),70.1% (95%CI:65.1%-74.8%) and 9.389 (95%CI:3.482-25.319),respectively.The area under the curve and Q* value in SROC were 0.824 4 and 0.757 5.Conclusion:As a no injury imaging test,18FDG PET is valuable for the assessment of neoadjuvant therapy response in esophageal cancer.
出处 《中国癌症杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期673-679,共7页 China Oncology
关键词 META分析 食管癌 新辅助治疗 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 氟化去氧葡萄糖 meta-analysis esophageal neoplasm neoadjuvant therapy tomography emissioncomputed FDG
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Altekruse SF,Kosary CL,Krapcho M,et al.SEER Cancer Statistics Review,1975-2007,National Cancer Institute.Bethesda,MD,http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2007/,based on November 2009 SEER data submission,posted to the SEER web site,2010.
  • 2Herszényi L,Tulassay Z.Epidemiology of gastrointestinal and liver tumors[J].Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2010,14(4):249-258.
  • 3Zhan P,Dai M,Chen W,et el.Cancer trends in China[J].Jpn J Clin Oncol,2010,40(4):281-285.
  • 4Hulscher JB,Tijssen JG,Obertop H,et al.Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus:a meta-analysis[J].Ann Thorac Surg,2001,72:306-313.
  • 5Schwaiger M,Peschel C.Biological imaging for selecling and monitoring cancer therapy:a pathway to individualised therapy[J].Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2006,33(Suppl 1):1-5.
  • 6Kelsen DP,Winter KA,Gunderson LL,et el.Long term results of RTOG trial 8911(USA Intergroup 113):a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2007,5:3719-3725.
  • 7Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Reitsma JB,et al.The development of QUADAS:a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews[J].BMC Med Res methodol,2003,3:25.
  • 8Could MK,Kuschner WG,Rydzak CE,et al.Test performance of positron emission tomography and computed tomography for mediastinal staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer:a mete-analysis[J].Ann Intern Med,2003,39(11):879-892.
  • 9Zamora J,Abraira V,Muriel A,et al.Meta-DiSc:a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data[J].BMC Med Res Methedol,2006,6:31.
  • 10Klaeser B,Nitzsche E,Schuller JC,et al.Limited predictive value of FDG-PET for response assessment in the preopera tive treatment of esophageal cancer:results of a prospective multi-center trial(SAKK 75/02)[J].Onkologie,2009,32(12):724-730.

共引文献1

同被引文献68

  • 1袁双虎,于金明,于甬华,杨新华,付政,杨国仁,郭洪波,王晓航,周英智,陈少卿.^(18)F-脱氧葡萄糖PET-CT检测食管癌病变长度的临床价值[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(5):389-392. 被引量:45
  • 2邢军,李建彬,刘娟,卢洁,范廷勇,邵倩.PET-CT图像融合在食管癌精确放疗中的应用[J].实用癌症杂志,2007,22(3):290-292. 被引量:9
  • 3郭洪波,于金明,张百江,杨国仁,付政,张为迪,黄勇,刘聿辉.^(18)F-FDG PET/CT显像对食管癌原发灶长度的测量[J].中华核医学杂志,2007,27(3):185-186. 被引量:6
  • 4Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer inci- dence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24: 2137-2150.
  • 5Lowe VJ, Booya F, Fletcher JG, et al. Comparison of positron e- mission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic uhra- sound in the initial staging of patients with esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol, 2005, 7 : 422-430.
  • 6Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Ohja B, et al. The accuracy of endoscopic ul- trasonography with fine-needle aspiration, integrated positron emission tomography with computed tomography, and computed tomography in restaging patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradio- therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Stag, 2005, 129: 1232-1241.
  • 7陈远光,高潘福.FDG PET/CT在癌症中的应用.中国台湾:力大图书有限公司,2009:171-172.
  • 8Meyers BF, Downey RJ, Decker PA, et al. The utility of positron emission tomography in staging of potentially operable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus : results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2007, 133 : 738-745.
  • 9Kato H, Kimura H, Nakajima M, et al. The additional value of in- tegrated PET/CT over PET in initial lymph node staging of esopha- geal cancer. Oncol Rep, 2008, 20: 857-862.
  • 10Okada M, Murakami T, Kumano S, et al. Integrated FDG-PET/CT compared with intravenous contrast-enhanced CT for evaluation of metastatic regional lymph nodes in patients with resectable early stage esophageal cancer. Ann Nucl Med, 2009, 23 : 73-80.

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部