期刊文献+

财政支农提高农民生活水平效果分析 被引量:3

Analysis of the Effect of Governmental Financially Supporting Agriculture on Improving Farmers' Living Standard
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析表明,我国财政支农的四项主要支出,即支援农村生产支出、农村基本建设支出、农村科技三项费用支出、农村救济费支出,与农村居民家庭恩格尔系数之间均存在长期稳定关系。农业基本建设支出对农村居民家庭恩格尔系数变化的贡献率最大,科技投入对提高农民生活水平的效果也显而易见,而支援农业生产支出和农村救济费支出对农村家庭恩格尔系数变化的影响较小。应保证农业基本建设支出,不断增加农业科技三项费用支出,提高财政支援农村生产支出使用效率,并仍需加大农村救济费支出。 Analysis indicates that four major expenditures of China governmentally supporting agriculture include the expenditure on rural production,expenditure on rural infrastructure construction,expenditure on three fees of rural scientific and technological construction and expenditure on rural relief and that there is a long-term stability relation between the four expenditures and the Engel's Coefficient of rural residents.Agricultural basic construction expenditure has most contribution rate to the change of Engel's Coefficient of rural resident families,however,the effect of scientific and technological investment on improving peasants' living standard is obvious but the impact of expenditure on rural production and rural relief on the change of Engel's Coefficient of rural families is relatively small.China should ensure the expenditure on agricultural infrastructure construction,constantly increase the expenditure on three fees of scientific and technological investment in agriculture,raise the use rate of agricultural production of the expenditure and continue to increase the expenditure on rural relief.
作者 睢党臣 林丽
出处 《西部论坛》 2010年第5期20-26,共7页 West Forum
基金 陕西师范大学"211"工程三期重点学科建设项目(884071)
关键词 财政支农 农民生活水平 恩格尔系数 支援农村生产支出 农业基本建设支出 农业科技三项费用支出 农村救济费支出 financial expenditure on agriculture farmers' living standard Engel's Coefficient expenditure on supporting rural production rural infrastructure construction expenditure expenditure on three fees of rural science and technology expenditure on rural relief
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献65

  • 1冯英浚,李成红.二次相对效益──衡量企业经济效益的一种新指标[J].中国软科学,1995(7):30-37. 被引量:77
  • 2熊吉峰.财政支农绩效的数量分析[J].统计与决策,2006,22(4):81-82. 被引量:11
  • 3欧阳华.财政支农资金使用效益的实证研究[J].重庆社会科学,2006(9):19-23. 被引量:10
  • 4崔元锋,严立冬.基于DEA的财政农业支出资金绩效评价[J].农业经济问题,2006,27(9):37-40. 被引量:79
  • 5De Borger, B. , Kerstens, K. , Moesen, W. , Vanneste, J.. Explaining differences in productive efficiency: An application to Belgian Munieipalities[J]. Public Choice, 1994, 80 (3/4): 339-358.
  • 6De Borger, B. , Kerstens, K.. Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics,1996a, 26: 145-170.
  • 7Athanassopoulos, A., Triantis, K.. Assessing aggregate cost efficiency and the related policy implications for Greek local municipalities[J]. INFOR, 1998, 36 ,(3) : 66-83.
  • 8Afonso, Fernandes. Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government.. Evidence for the Portuguese Municipalities[R]. ISEG economics working paper, 2005.
  • 9Afonso, Schuknecht, Tanzi. Public sector efficiency: An international comparison[J].Public Choice, 123.
  • 10Angelopoulos, K., Philippopoulos, A., Tsionas, E.. Does public sector efficiency matter? Revisiting the relation between fiscal size and economic growth in a world sample[J]. Public Choice, 2008, 137: 245-278.

共引文献185

同被引文献12

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部