期刊文献+

证券市场虚假陈述侵权责任因果关系的认定 被引量:5

The Cognizance on the Tort Causation of Misrepresentation in Securities Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于证券交易的特殊性,如何判定被告虚假陈述行为与原告损失之间存在因果关系,是证券市场虚假陈述民事赔偿案件的难点,也是长期困扰理论界与实务界的一大难题。借鉴美国普通法和证券法对因果关系的规定,我国最高人民法院对虚假陈述因果关系的认定做出了具体规定。该规定对于减轻投资者的举证责任,维护其合法权益具有重要积极意义。但是,该规定还仍然存在一些问题,有待进一步完善。 Because of the particularity of securities trading,how to determine the causation between defendant’s infringement and plaintiff’s loss is a difficulty in civil damage compensation cases of misrepresentation in securities market,and also a problem long plagued the theoretical and practical.Borrow ideas from the regulations of causality in American common law and security law,the Supreme People's Court made specific provision on the judgment of the causation of misrepresentation.These regulations have important positive significance to reduce the burden of investors and safeguard their legitimate rights and interests.However,there are also some problems in these regulations which should be further improved.
作者 叶承芳
出处 《北京青年政治学院学报》 2010年第4期71-76,共6页 Journal of Beijing Youth Politics College
关键词 虚假陈述 因果关系 欺诈市场理论 Misrepresentation Causation Fraud-on-market theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献3

  • 1[5][8]Barbara Black. Fraud on the Market: A Criticism of Dispensing with Reliance Requirements in Certain Open Market Transactions[J]. North Carolina Law Review, March 1984.
  • 2[6]Eugene F. Fama. Foundation of finance[M]. Basic Books, Inc.1976. 132.
  • 3[美]瓦茨,齐默尔曼. 实证会计理论[M]. 陈少华译.大连:东北财经大学出版社, 1999.

共引文献43

同被引文献41

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部