期刊文献+

小切口胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比研究 被引量:3

Comparative study of mini-incision cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对比小切口胆囊切除术(MC)与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)在胆囊切除方面的优劣。方法选取需行胆囊切除术的胆囊疾病患者168例,按随机数字表法分为MC组(90例)和LC组(78例),比较两组临床疗效。结果MC组手术时间[(37.2±12.3)min]比LC组[(51.6±14.6)min]明显缩短(P〈0.05)。MC组、LC组住院时间分别为(1.7±1.1)、(1.8±0.9)d,痊愈时间分别为(15.9±3.2)、(14.8±4.9)d,两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。体重指数对两组的手术时问和术后恢复时间无影响。结论对于非复杂性胆囊结石,MC与LC相比,手术时间短,术后患者恢复时间相近。MC更适合肥胖患者行胆囊切除手术。 Objective To compare the effect of mini-incision cholecystectomy (MC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC). Methods Totally 168 patients with gallbladder disease were treated by cholecystectomy, they were divided into MC group (90 cases ) and LC group (78 cases ) using random digits table,and comparing the clinical effect between the two groups. Results The operating time was significantly shorter in MC group [(37.2 ± 12.3) mini than that in LC group [(51.6 ± 14.6) mini(P〈 0.05). The length of stay and postoperative recovery time were ( 1.7 ± 1.1 ), ( 15.9 ± 3.2) d in MC group, ( 1.8 ± 0.9), ( 14.8 ± 4.9) d in LC group, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P 〉 0.05). Body mass,index had no influence to the operating time and postoperative recovery time. Conclusions With not complexity cholecystolithiasis, compared with LC, MC had shorter operating time, but no significant difference in postoperative recovery time. The MC procedure also seems to be suitable for the obese patients.
作者 黄宗铭
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2010年第29期31-33,共3页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 剖腹术 胆囊切除术 腹腔镜 对比研究 Laparotomy Cholecystectomy,laparoscopic Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献22

共引文献33

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部