期刊文献+

住宅遭受交通噪声污染时开发商应承担的民事责任初探 被引量:3

Analysis on Responsibility of Dwelling Developers for Traffic Noise Pollution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从分析住宅遭受交通噪声污染时开发商民事责任的性质入手,探讨了现行声环境质量标准对开发商的适用性和合理性,阐明了开发商的责任范围,提出了完善住宅声环境质量标准的建议。主要结论:目前我国尚缺乏合理的约束开发商的住宅声环境质量标准;开发商的隔声减噪义务主要包括留出与道路之间的防噪距离和采取安装隔声窗、封闭阳台等隔声措施;应将门窗封闭状态下的室内噪声限值颁布为住宅声环境质量标准。 Based on the analyzing the nature of civil liability for residential developers about their developed dwellings polluted by traffic noise,the applicability and rationality of the current standards of acoustic environmental quality are discussed.The responsibility of developers is defined and the perfection of standards for acoustic environmental quality in residential area is suggested.It mainly concludes as follows: it is still a lack of standards for acoustic environmental quality to reasonably restraint the residential developers;residential developers' duty comprises keeping distance between dwellings and roads to control the noise,and taking measures of sound insulation such as acoustic windows,closing of balcony and so on;the indoor noise limits with doors and windows closed should be set as the residential acoustic environmental quality.
作者 李剑
出处 《四川环境》 2010年第5期127-129,138,共4页 Sichuan Environment
关键词 环境污染 交通噪声 商品房交易 环境质量标准 Environment pollution traffic noise dwelling trade environmental quality standards
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1蒋文军.论开发商在商品房道路交通噪声污染中的民事责任-基于三个司法判例展开的分析[A].王利明主编.判解研究2005年第1辑[c].北京:人民法院出版社,2005.138-168.
  • 2邱伟.公路地铁噪声愁煞人,通惠家园业主为噪音上法庭[EB/OL].http://80ufun.com/news/2004-06-09/285307.htm,2004-06-09.
  • 3丁慧.买房噪音太大,告状要求整改,业主购房前已知情其诉请未获支持[N].人民法院报,2005-01-12(4).
  • 4丁慧.上海一房屋业主噪音超标之诉未获支持[EB/OL].http://www.chinaeourt.org/public/detail.php?id=146171,2005-01-12.
  • 5付中.马路噪音影响日常生活,业主状告开发商诉求被驳回[EB/OL].http:///news.wxren.com/NewsFiles/354/20070406/41914.shtml,2007-07-06.
  • 6刘洋.京通快速路噪声案终落幕16户业主获补偿[EB/OL].http://www.chinacourt.org/publie/detail.php?id=189778.2005-12-21.

共引文献1

同被引文献13

  • 1蒋文军.论开发商在商品房道路交通噪声污染中的民事责任-基于三个司法判例展开的分析[A].王利明主编.判解研究2005年第1辑[c].北京:人民法院出版社,2005.138-168.
  • 2难忍噪声小区业主告开发商法院驳回原告诉讼请求[OL].htrp://news.xinhuanet.com/hour/2011-09/136/c_121982803.htm.
  • 3英国噪声控制协会网站[OL]. http://noiseabatementsoci-ety. com/john 一 connell - awards/.
  • 4欧盟环境部网站[OL].http://www. eea. europa. eu/highlighta/cutting - noise - with — quiet - asphalt/ soundscape - awards —winner - 2014 - alvema.
  • 5香港环保署关于环境噪声的教材[OL].http:// www. epd.gov. hk/epd/noise _ education / index, html.
  • 6朱毅勉,罗志永,陈槟.透过三维立体视像表达技术增强公众对环境噪声的理解[C].第一届环境影响评价国际论坛论文集,博鳌:国家环境保护总局环境影响评价管理司,2004:111-114.
  • 7Anita Gidl of Gunnarsson,Evy Ohrstr Om. The potential role ofperceived availability to neaiby green areas [ J ]. Landscape andUrban Planning,2007 ( 83) :115 - 126.
  • 8难忍噪声小区业主告开发商,法院驳回原告诉讼请求[OL].大河网.[2011-09-26].http://Ilew$.xinhuanet.corn/house/201I一09/06/e-121982803.htm.
  • 9蒋文军.论开发商在商品房道路交通噪声污染中的民事责任-基于三个司法削例展开的分析[C]//王利明主编.判解研究.北京:人民法院出版社.2005,(1):138-168.
  • 10Nese Y ugruk Akdag. A simple method to determinate rexp.tired Rtr values of building envelopecomponents against road traffic noi[ J ]. Building and Environment. 2004,39 : 1327 - 1332.

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部