期刊文献+

专利联营的反垄断规制及应对 被引量:1

Anti-Trust Regulation and Reaction of Patent Pool
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2008年《反垄断法》正式实施及其后的配套法规、指南相继出台,反垄断法躯干日益丰满,但对专利联营的规制依然是一片空白。《国家知识产权战略纲要》的出台,高举创新的大旗,但在高新技术领域,专利联营的问题日益突出。结合近年来最新的学术成果、国外的优秀经验和具体的实例,对专利联营问题进行重新审视,立足中国实际,以"拿来主义"的眼光,提出有针对性的应对措施显得尤为迫切。 At the turn of the 21 st century, the 3C and the 6 C alliance of charges events have made the DVD industry in China on the verge of collapse. For the first time, the Chinese people are focusing on patent pool. The implementation of anti- trust law in 2008 has laid a foundation for the regulation against intellectual property abuse. With the successive introduction of some matching regulations and guidance since 2008, the subject of anti-trust law is well-developed. However, regulations of patent pool is still absent. Innovation has been highly advocated since the release of the Outline of National Intellectual Property Strategy. But in high and new-technology fields, patent pool has become an increasingly prominent issue. Therefore, combining with the latest academic achievements, outstanding foreign experience and some specific cases, the paper first has a new look into patent pool, and then it proposes that we should rely on reality in China, form the perspective of" take -in" principle and take some effective measures.
作者 汪磊
出处 《广东广播电视大学学报》 2010年第5期32-38,共7页 Journal of Guangdong Radio & Television University
关键词 专利联营 反垄断规制 知识产权 Patent Pool antitrust regulation intellectual property
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1中国影音、家电业亟待解决专利费之痛[DB/OL].http://www.cnele.com/CN/mod-new-act-item-aid-33749/33749.html:2010-05-30.
  • 2“DVD之诉”胜算几何[DB/OL].http://news.sohu.com/20041103/n222820619.shtml,2010-05-30.
  • 3五位教授状告DVD“垃圾专利”[DB/OL].http://fiD_atlce.sina.com.on/roll/20060821/1002871944.shtml.2010-05-30.
  • 4美国专利商标局专利联营白皮书:PATENT POOLS:A SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM OF ACCESS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS?[DB/OL].http: // www. uspto, gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/opla/ patentpool, pdf:4.2010-05-30.
  • 5张平,孟兆平.专利联营的反垄断法规制[J].电子知识产权,2007(7):13-15. 被引量:6
  • 6王先林.知识产权与反垄断法[M]北京:法律出版社2008:73-78.
  • 7宁立志,胡贞珍.从美国法例看专利联营的反垄断法规制[J].环球法律评论,2006,28(4):469-477. 被引量:15
  • 82000年指南[DB/OL].httP://www.ftc.gov/OS/2000/04/ftcdojguidelities.pdf.2010-06-02.
  • 9张伟君.欧共体2004年技术转让协议豁免条例介绍[DB/OL].http://web.tongji.edu.cn/^-ipi/communion/zwj21.htm.2010-06一05.
  • 10王先林,潘志成.反垄断法适用于知识产权领域的基本政策主张——日本《知识产权利用的反垄断法指南》介评[J].电子知识产权,2008(1):36-40. 被引量:12

二级参考文献12

  • 1王源扩.试论与知识产权有关的反竞争行为及其法律控制[J].政法论坛,1996,14(4):66-70. 被引量:57
  • 2李玉剑,宣国良.专利联盟反垄断规制的比较研究[J].知识产权,2004,14(5):52-55. 被引量:29
  • 3Joel I.Klein.An Address to the American Intellectual Property Law Association ,on the Subject of Cross-Licensing and antitrust Law[EB/OL].1997[1997-05-02]http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/speeches/1123.htm.
  • 4马骏,张平.专利型技术标准的机制与政策[EB/OL].2007[2007-05-20]http://www.dss.gov.cn/Article_Print.asp?ArticleID=165279.
  • 5M.Howard Morse.Prepared Testimony of Cross-Licensing and Patent Pools[EB/OL].2002[2002-04-17]http://www.gtwassociares.com/alerts/FTCDJHEARINGS.htm.
  • 6Second Amended Class-Action Complaint,Wuxi Multimedia,Ltd.,Orient Power (Wuxi)Digital Technology,Ltd,V.Koninklijke Philips Electronics,N.V.,Dba Philips Intellectual Property and Standards,Sony ,Pioneer,Lg Electronics,(United States District Court Southern District Of California Case No.04 Cv 1136 Dms (Blm))[EB/OL].2007[2007-05-01]http://www.handal-litigation.com/pages/Wuxi%20v.%20Philips%20Second%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf.
  • 7Japan Fair Trade Commission, Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property under the Antimonopoly Act [EB/ OL]. [2007-11-26]ahttp://www.jfcc.go.jp/e-pagedegislafion/ama/ 070928 _IP_ Guideline.pdf.
  • 8Strategic Council on Intellectual Property of Japan, Intellectual Property Policy Outline [EB/OL]. [2007-11-26]. http://www.ka - ntei.go.jp/foreign/policy/titeki/kettei/020703 taikou_e.html.
  • 9Japan Intellectual Property Association, Opinions on the "Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property under the Antimonopoly Act" [EB/OL]. [2007 -11-26]Jattp://www.jipa. or.jp/content/english/opinion/doc/070607.pdf.
  • 10The Commission of the European Communities, Commission Regulation (EC) No 772/2004[EB/OL]. [2007-11- 26].http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2004/1- 123/1_123200404 27en00110017.pdf.

共引文献29

同被引文献10

  • 1T F Cotter. Pragmatism, Economics and the Droit Moral. (1997) 76 North Carolina Law Review, 1, 214, 250.
  • 2Ilkka Rahnasto, Intellectual Property Right, External Effects and Anti-trust law, Oxford University Press (2003) pp. 37, 38.
  • 3Ilkka Rahnasto, Intellectual Property Right, External Effects and Anti-trust law, Oxford University Press (2003) pp. 35.
  • 4Ilkka Rahnasto, Intellectual Property Right, External Effects and Anti-trust law, Oxford University Press (2003) pp. 62.
  • 5Bement v. National harrow Co. , 186 U. S. , p. 91.
  • 6Willard K. Tom, Joshua A. Newberg. Antitrust and In- tellectual Property. From separate Spheres to Unified, 66Antitrust L. J. , 1997, p. 169.
  • 7Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. United States 226U. K, 20 (1912) .
  • 8Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States323 U.S. 386 (1945) .
  • 9王先林,仲春.知识产权领域反垄断的国际视角——《竞争政策与知识产权行使》介评[J].电子知识产权,2009(5):59-63. 被引量:6
  • 10朱淑娣,李祖军.浅析美国知识产权反垄断法政策目标之演变——从历史的、法社会学的视角[J].行政与法,2009(12):104-108. 被引量:2

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部