期刊文献+

阴道镜检查在宫颈上皮内瘤变中的诊断价值分析 被引量:3

The analysis of diagnostic value of colposcopy in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨阴道镜检查对宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的诊断价值。方法:选择2008年1月~2009年12月在本院妇科门诊经阴道镜检查并取活检诊断为CIN,继之行宫颈LEEP环切术或宫颈锥切术治疗的124例患者,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果:阴道镜下组织学诊断与宫颈LEEP环切术或宫颈锥切术最后诊断符合率为69.35%(86/124),不符合率为30.65%(38/124),其中级别升高者占7.26%,其中有4例最终诊断为宫颈浸润癌,漏诊率为3.23%(4/124);级别降低者占23.39%(29/124)。结论:阴道镜检查在诊断CIN和宫颈早期浸润癌方面,具有一定的临床价值,但对高级别的CIN应结合宫颈LEEP术或电刀锥切术作为进一步的诊断依据。 Objective:Colposcopy of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnosis.Methods:From January 2008 to December 2009 in our hospital gynecology clinic by colposcopy and biopsy diagnosis of CIN,followed by cervical loop ex cision procedure LEEP or cervical conization treatment of 124 patients,the clinical A retrospective analysis.Results:Histological diagnosis under colposcopy and cervical loop excision procedure LEEP or cervical conization final diagnosis was 69.35%(86/124),those who do not meet the 30.65%(38/124),which accounted for 7.26% level rise,of which 4 cases diag nosed as invasive cervical cancer,missed diagnosis rate was 3.23%(4/124);level accounted for 23.39% reduction(29/124).Conclusion:Colposcopy in the diagnosis of CIN and early invasive cervical area,has some clinical value,but on the high level of CIN should be combined with LEEP procedure or electric knife cervical conization as a further diagnosis.
作者 鲁春雁
出处 《中国当代医药》 2010年第29期34-35,共2页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 阴道镜检查 宫颈上皮内瘤变 宫颈环形电切或锥切术 Colposcopy Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Cervical loop electrosurgical excision or conization
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献39

  • 1张建兰,彭敏,郭晓玲,柳晓春,潘淑芬.阴道镜筛查宫颈病变6051例临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(11):679-680. 被引量:40
  • 2宋爽,付涛.阴道镜配合病理活检对宫颈病变筛查的结果分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(1):31-32. 被引量:10
  • 3Fung KFM, Senterman M, Faught W. Should endocervieal excision and curettage be done during LEEP? Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 1997,18(2) :104.
  • 4Hillemanns P, Kimmig R, Danneeker C, et al. LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias.Zentralbl Gynakol,2000,122( 1 ) :35.
  • 5Boulanger JC, Gondry J, Verhoest P, et al. Treatment of CIN after menopause. Bur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2001,95 (2) : 175.
  • 6John Y,John A,Julius,et al. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in postcone hysterectomy specimens. Obstet Gyneco1,1994,84( 1 ) :128.
  • 7Lapaquette TK, Dinh TV, Hannigan E, et al. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol,1993,82(3) :440.
  • 8Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcon T, et al. The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome : North American experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995,172 (4) : 1246.
  • 9Cruickshank ME, Flannelly G, Campbell DM, et al. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynecol, 1995,102 (6) :467.
  • 10Wright TC Jr,Cox JT,Massad LS,et al.2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.American Society for colposcopy and cervical Pathology[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2003,189:295-304.

共引文献562

同被引文献11

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部