期刊文献+

基于神经网络与表决融合的核动力装置故障诊断方法 被引量:1

Fault Diagnosis Method for Nuclear Power Plants Based on Neural Networks and Voting Fusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对单神经网络(ANN)故障诊断方法的不足,将多神经网络诊断与表决融合方法结合起来,研究了基于多神经网络与表决融合的核动力装置故障诊断方法。在该方法中,多个不同类型的神经网络训练后用于核动力装置的故障诊断。选择对核动力装置安全有重要影响的运行参数作为各神经网络的输入变量,神经网络的输出是核动力装置的故障模式。用表决融合方法对不同神经网络的诊断结果进行融合,从而得到核动力装置故障诊断的最后结果。利用核动力装置典型的运行模式来验证所提出的诊断方法的效果。结果表明,与单神经网络相比,该方法可提高核动力装置故障诊断结果的精度和可靠性。 A new fault diagnosis method based on multiple neural networks (ANNs) and voting fusion for nuclear power plants (NPPs) was proposed in view of the shortcoming of single neural network fault diagnosis method. In this method, multiple neural networks that the types of neural networks were different were trained for the fault diagnosis of NPP. The operation parameters of NPP, which have important affect on the safety of NPP, were selected as the input variable of neural networks. The output of neural networks is fault patterns of NPP. The last results of diagnosis for NPP were obtained by fusing the diagnosing results of different neural networks by voting fusion. The typical operation patterns of NPP were diagnosed to demonstrate the effect of the proposed method. The results show that employing the proposed diagnosing method can improve the precision and reliability of fault diagnosis results of NPPs.
出处 《原子能科学技术》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第B09期367-372,共6页 Atomic Energy Science and Technology
基金 海军工程大学科研基金资助项目(HGDJJ07012) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20080441291)
关键词 核动力装置 神经网络 表决融合 故障诊断 nuclear power plant neural networks voting fusion fault diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献41

  • 1黎洪生,史龙伟,吴炜,侯鹏.多传感器融合技术在应变检测中的应用[J].测控技术,2004,23(10):8-10. 被引量:4
  • 2韩敏,林丽玉.基于神经网络集成的蛋白质二级结构预测模型[J].计算机与应用化学,2006,23(10):959-962. 被引量:11
  • 3奚玮君,李绍军,钱锋.基于Alopex的粒子群算法及其在软测量上的应用[J].计算机与应用化学,2006,23(11):1045-1048. 被引量:7
  • 4NABESHIMA K, SUZUDO T, SUZUKI K. Real time nuclear plant monitoring with neural network [J].Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 1998, 35(2):93-100.
  • 5HAM F M, KOSTANIC I. Principles of nearocomputing for science & engineering[M]. First Edition. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2003: 140-151.
  • 6UPADHYAYA B R, YAN W, BEHRAVESH M M, et al. Development of a diagnostic expert system for eddy current data analysis using applied artificial intelligence methods[J].Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1999, 193: 1-11.
  • 7AHMADD Z, ZHANG J. Combination of multiple neural networks using data fusion techniques for enhanced nonlinear process modelling [J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2005, 30 :295-308.
  • 8ZHANG J. Improved on-line process fault diagnosis through information fusion in multiple neu ral networks [J].Computers and Chemical Engi neering, 2006, 30: 558-571.
  • 9MO K, LEE S J, SEONG P H. A dynamic neural network aggregation model for transient diagnosis in nuclear power plants [J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2007, 49: 262-272.
  • 10kalman RE, Bucy RS. New Result in Linear Filtering and Predictions Theory[J]. Trans. ASME, Series D, 1961,83.

共引文献21

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部