期刊文献+

冲突管理方式对团队绩效的影响研究 被引量:5

Research of Conflict Management Mode Effect on Team Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过实证验证了不同冲突管理方式影响不同类型团队绩效的研究模型与假设,并进行了讨论。采用陈国权(Guoquan Chen,2000)团队绩效以及由Rahim和Magner开发的包括整合式、帮助式、支配式、折衷式、逃避式的冲突管理方式的5因子量表,通过有效的问卷调查,应用SPSS进行数据分析,进而验证工作团队中整合式呈显著正影响,帮助式呈不显著负影响,支配式呈不显著正影响,折衷式呈不显著负影响,逃避式呈不显著负影响;并行团队中整合式呈显著正影响,帮助式呈显著正影响,支配式呈正影响,折衷式呈显著负影响,逃避式呈显著负影响;项目团队中整合式呈显著正影响;帮助式呈不显著负影响,支配式呈不显著正影响,折衷式呈不显著负影响,逃避式呈不显著正影响;管理团队中整合式呈显著正影响,帮助式呈不显著正影响,支配式呈不显著正影响,折衷式呈不显著负影响,逃避式呈不显著正影响。 This paper discusses and verifies the research model and hypothesis of the different conflict management mode effect on different types of team performance by means of demonstration. This paper adopts team performance of Guoquan Chen (2000), and applies the five factor measure tables of conflict management mode developed by Rahim and Magner, which includes integrating type, obliging type, dominating type, compromising type, avoiding type. Through effective questionnaires and the data analysis by SPSS, this paper verifies the integrating type has a significant positive effect in the work team, the obliging type has a non-significant negative effect, the dominating type has a non-significant positive effect, the compromising type has a non-significant negative effect, the avoiding type has a non-significant negative effect; the integrating type has a significant positive effect in the parallel team, the obliging type has a significant positive effect, the dominating type has a positive effect, the compromising type has a significant negative effect, the avoiding type has a significant negative effect; the integrating type has a significant positive effect in the project team, the obliging type has a non-significant negative effect, the dominating type has a non-significant positive effect, the compromising type has a non-significant negative effect, the avoiding type has a non-significant positive effect; the integrating type has a significant positive effect in the management team, the obliging type has a non-significant positive effect, the dominating type has a non-significant positive effect, the compromising type has a non-significant negative effect, the avoiding type has a non- significant positive effect.
作者 万涛
出处 《技术经济与管理研究》 北大核心 2010年第6期61-66,共6页 Journal of Technical Economics & Management
关键词 冲突管理 团队类型 绩效影响 Conflict Management Team Type Performance Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Guoquan Chen, Dean Tjosvold. Conflict Management and Team Effectiveness in China: The Mediating Role of Justice[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2002( 19 ):557-572.
  • 2Dean Tjosvold,Chun Hun,Ziyou Yu. Conflict management and task reflexivity for team in-role and extra-role performance in china[J]. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 2003, 14(2): 141-163.
  • 3Guoquan Chen,Chunhong Liu,Dean Tjosvold. Conflict Management for Effective Top Management Teams and Innovation in China[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2005, 42(3): 2200-2380.
  • 4李慧才.以项目团队为基础的组织环境探析[J].山西经济管理干部学院学报,2003,11(4):26-27. 被引量:1
  • 5郑敏芝,宋延军.战略性绩效管理:组织发展的推进器[J].技术经济与管理研究,2009(3):63-65. 被引量:19
  • 6M Afzalur Rahim. Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict[J]. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 2002,13(3):206-235.
  • 7M Afzalur Rahim. Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict[J]. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 2002,13(3):206-235.
  • 8M Afzalur Rahim, Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict[J].The International Journal of Conflict Management, 2002,13(3): 206-235.

二级参考文献3

  • 1斯蒂芬.罗宾斯.组织行为学(第10版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.2004:542-550.
  • 2加里.德斯勒.曾湘泉.人力资源管理(第10版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.2007:286-326.
  • 3林彬.绩效考核与管理假设[J].人力资源,2004(5):40-41. 被引量:3

共引文献18

同被引文献68

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部