摘要
"权利消减"的时效构成背离了人类的一般道德情操和自然正义观念,而"公益"、"社会秩序"、"信赖保护"、"社会效率"、"不保护权利上的休眠者"等都不能使该构成正当化。将时效定性为"权利推定"的制度,克服真正权利人或已免责义务人的举证困难,将从根本上去除时效制度的反道德性,使其成为"人类权利的保护神"。
" Extinctive prescription" is held inconsistent with man' s general moral sense and natural justice and cannot be justified with "public interest," "social order, " "trust protection," "social efficiency," or "un-protection for dormant obligatee. " However, where prescription is supposed as a " presumptive right" which may alleviate the burden of proof of the real obligatee or the exempted obligor, its anti-moral character will be eliminated and it will turn to be a "preserver of human rights. "
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期52-59,共8页
Modern Law Science
基金
西南政法大学重点科研项目"民法时效制度研究"(2007-xz-zd-16)研究成果之一
关键词
消灭时效
取得时效
存在理由
道德
extinctive prescription
acquisitive prescription
argument for existence
morality