期刊文献+

境外反垄断法刑事责任规定的比较与借鉴 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 综观现代主要国家和地区的反垄断法,几乎均是综合运用民事、行政和刑事责任制度来规制垄断行为。我国虽然已于2008年出台了反垄断法,但在法律责任制度的设计上却缺少了刑事制裁。我国反垄断法律责任的构建虽立足于本国国情的基础上,但也应关注发达国家和地区的立法实践。对境外反垄断法刑事责任制度进行必要的借鉴与吸收,这对于完善我国反垄断法法律责任制度具有重要的意义。
作者 李黔豫
出处 《经济研究导刊》 2010年第29期157-159,共3页 Economic Research Guide
基金 贵州省教育厅2009年度人文社会科学专项项目(092x156)阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1李国海.论反垄断法中的慎刑原则——兼论我国反垄断立法的非刑事化[J].法商研究,2006,23(1):12-16. 被引量:33
  • 2Scott D. Hammond. From Hollywood to Hong Kong Criminal Antitrust Enforcement is Coming to a City Near You.14 Loy. Consumer L. Rev. 567 (2002).
  • 318 U.S.C.3571(d).
  • 4Scott D. Hammond. Detecting and Deterring Cartel Activity through an Effective Leniency Program. November 21-22,2000. http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/speeches/9928.htm.
  • 5Scott D. Hammond. An Overview of Recent Development in the Antitrust Division's Criminal Enforcement Program.January 10, 2005. http://www.usdoj. gov/atr/public/speeches/207226.htm.
  • 6Donald I. Baker. Pyrrhic Victories? Reexamining the Effectiveness of Antitrust Remedies in Restoring Competition and Deterring Misconduct: The Use of Criminal Law Remedies to Deter and Punish Cartels and Bid-Rigging. 69 Geo. Wash.L. Rev. 693, 2001.
  • 7Gray R. Spratling. the Trend towards Higher Corporate Fines:It's a Whole New Ball Game. , March 7,1997. http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/speeches/4011.htm.
  • 8Chad Stockel. Sherman's March on Japan: U.S. v. Nippon Paper and the Extraterritorial Reach ot Criminal Antitrust Law. 9 Transnat'l L. & Contemp, Probs, 399. Spring, 1999.
  • 9Scott D. Hammond. Connerstone of an Effective Leniency Program. November 22-23, 2004. http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/speeches/206611.htm.
  • 10David Henry. Leniency Programs: An Anaemic Carrot for Cartels in France Germany and the UK. E. C. L. R2005, 26(1): 13-23.

共引文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部