期刊文献+

血清细胞角蛋白19在预测进展期非小细胞肺癌患者化疗疗效及预后中的临床意义 被引量:8

Clinical Significance of Serum Cytokeratin 19 Fragment in the Prediction of Chemotherapy Efficacy and Prognosis in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景与目的由于RECIST(Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, RECIST)标准不能对存活肿瘤组织进行检测,也不能对所有无法测量病灶的非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)患者的疗效进行准确评估,本研究通过检测进展期NSCLC患者化疗前后血清细胞角蛋白19片段(cytokeratin 19 fragment, CYFRA21-1) 表达水平的变化以评价其在预测进展期NSCLC患者化疗疗效及预后中的临床价值。方法采用全自动生化分析仪电化学发光免疫法检测112例初治的NSCLC患者化疗前和化疗2周期后血清CYFRA21-1表达水平的变化,应用受试者特征工作曲线(receiver operating characteristics curve, ROC)评价血清CYFRA21-1反应在诊断影像学缓解(objective response, OR)中的效能及其与预后的相关性。结果经一线铂类为基础的两药联合方案化疗2周期后,血清CYFRA21-1水平较化疗前基线水平明显下降。80例可评价影像学和血清学疗效的患者中,26.3%(21/80)的患者达到影像学OR。化疗2周期后40.0%(32/80)的患者血清CYFRA21-1水平下降≥60%(血清CYFRA21-1反应)。血清CYFRA21-1反应与影像学OR之间有明显的统计学相关性(P<0.001)。所有患者的中位生存期为9.9个月,血清CYFRA21-1水平下降≥60%患者的生存期明显长于CYFRA21-1水平下降<60%的患者(12.3个月 vs 8.9个月,P<0.001)。单因素分析结果显示,血清CYFRA21-1基线水平、CYFRA21-1反应、PS评分及影像学OR是影响生存期的重要预后因素。Cox多因素生存分析证实,仅血清CYFRA21-1基线水平、CYFRA21-1反应及PS评分是影响预后生存期的独立因素,而OR则与预后无关。结论血清CYFRA21-1水平可敏感地反映影像学肿瘤体积大小的变化,可能是评价进展期NSCLC患者化疗疗效的替代指标,同时也是预测预后生存期的可信指标。 Background and objective RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria could not be used to detect viable tumor tissue and is not an accurate tool for evaluation of objective response (OR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without measurable lesions. The aim of this study is to detect the pre-and post-chemotherapy serum cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) expression levels in advanced NSCLC patients to evaluate the clinical value of CYFRA21-1 in the prediction of chemotherapy response and prognosis in NSCLC patients. Methods A automatic electrochemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer was applied to detect the pre-and post-chemotherapy serum CYFRA21-1 expression levels in 112 cases of initial treatment patients with NSCLC. Application of receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) curve in evaluation the significance of serum CYFRA21-1 response in the diagnosis of OR and its correlation with prognosis. Results After 2 cycles of platinum-based combined chemotherapy, post-chemotherapy serum CYFRA21-1 significantly decreased compared with baseline levels. 80 patients were evaluable for radiological and serological efficacy, and 26.3% (21/80) patients achieved radiological OR. The decrease ratio of post-chemotherapy serum CYFRA21-1 with CYFRA21-1 response was 40.0% (32/80). There was significant correlation between serum CYFRA21-1 response and OR (P〈0.001). The median survival time of all patients was 9.9 months; the survival of patients with CYFRA21-1 response were significantly longer than those without CYFRA21-1 responders (12.3 months vs 8.9 months, P〈0.001). Univariate survival analysis showed that PS score, OR, baseline serum CYFRA21-1 level and CYFRA21-1 response were important prognostic factors. Cox multivariate survival analysis confirmed that only the PS score, serum CYFRA21-1 baseline levels and CYFRA21-1 response were indepen-dent prognostic factors of NSCLC patients; OR was not an independent prognostic factor. Conclusion Serum CYFRA21-1 level can be sensitive to reflect changes in tumor volume, which may be a reliable substitution index for evaluation the chemotherapy efficacy in advanced NSCLC patients and a good indicator for prediction the prognosis of survival.
出处 《中国肺癌杂志》 CAS 2010年第10期954-961,共8页 Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
关键词 细胞角蛋白19片段 肺肿瘤 化疗疗效 影像学缓解 预测因素 预后因素 CYFRA21-1 Lung neoplasms Chemotherapy efficacy Radiological response Predictor factors Prognostic factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Kubota K, Kawahara Mj Ogawara M, et al. Vinorelbine plus gemcitabine followed by docetaxel versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. Lancet Oncol, 2008, 9(12): 1135-1142.
  • 2Noveno S, Falcone A, Crino L, et al. Randomised multicenter phase II study of two schedules of docetaxel and gemcitabine or cisplatin/gemcitabine followed by docetaxel as first line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 2009, 66(3): 327-332.
  • 3Radhakrishnan A, Bitran JD, Milton DT, et al. Docetaxel and oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial. J Chemother, 2009, 21 (4): 439-444.
  • 4Ollivier L, Leclere J, Thiesse P, et al. Measurement of tumour response to cancer treatment: morphologic imaging role. Bull Cancer, 2007, 94(2): 171-177.
  • 5Suzuki C, Jacobsson H, Hatschek T, et al. Radiologic measurements of tumor response to treatment: practical approaches and limitations. Radiographics, 2008, 28(2): 329-344.
  • 6Nisman B, Biran H, Heching N, et al. Prognostic role of serum cytokeratin 19 fragments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: association of marker changes after two chemotherapy cycles with different measures of clinical response and survival. BrJ Cancer, 2008, 98(1): 77-79.
  • 7Zateska M, Szturmowicz M, Zych J, et al. The significance of the serum tumour markers as a prognostic and predictor factors in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Pneumonol Alergol Pol, 2005, 73(3): 270-276.
  • 8Weber WA. Assessing tumor response to therapy. J Nucl Med, 2009, 50(Suppl 1): 1S-10S.
  • 9Kim MS, Lee SY, Cho WH, et al. Effect of increases in tumor volume after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the outcome of stage II osteosarcoma regardless of histological response.J Orthop Sci, 2009, 14(3): 292-297.
  • 10Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, et al. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med, 2009, 50(Suppl 1): 122S-150S.

同被引文献117

  • 1胡晓晔,吴海鹰,黄河,戴文清,彭晋,万小云.非小细胞肺癌患者血清CEA和CYFRA21-1检测预测疗效及预后价值的探讨[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2008,15(9):679-682. 被引量:11
  • 2郑洪泽,曲翠娥.肿瘤标志物检测的临床应用原则[J].滨州医学院学报,2007,30(1):70-71. 被引量:7
  • 3路宝士,康德元,孙宝义.血清CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE联检对肺癌的诊断价值[J].放射免疫学杂志,2007,20(2):182-183. 被引量:26
  • 4岳东升,王长利,张真发,战忠利.107例细支气管肺泡癌临床特征及预后分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2007,34(9):515-518. 被引量:21
  • 5Novello S,Falcone A,Crinò L,et al.Randomised multicenter phase Ⅱ study of two schedules of docetaxel and gemcitabine or cisplatin/gemcitabine followed by docetaxel as first line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer,2009,66:327-332.
  • 6Shepherd FA,Rodrigues Pereira J,Ciuleanu T,et al.Erlotinib in previously treaed non-small-cell lung cancer.N Engl J Med,2005,353:123-132.
  • 7Mok TS,Wu YL,Thongprasert S,et al.Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma.N Engl J Med,2009,361:947-957.
  • 8Xu XH,Su J,Fu XY,et al.Clinical effect of erlotinib as first-line treatment for Asian elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol,2011,67:475-479.
  • 9Wahl RL,Jacene H,Kasamon Y,et al.From RECIST to PERCIST:evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.J Nucl Med,2009,50:122S-150S.
  • 10Zateska M,Szturmowicz M,Zych J,et al.The significance of the serum tumour markers as a prognostic and predictor factors in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients.Pneumonol Alergol Pol,2005,73:270-276.

引证文献8

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部